Pillow baby

[Barbarossa]

The most humane thing to do would be to let her die.

How exactly are you going to do that? Starvation?

[Busyman™]

Can someone tell me what this thread is about?

No, read it yourself, and don't be so fuckin lazy.

It's a time thing....large article and I wanted to know if it was interesting or not.

[Busyman™]

BM you only need to read the first 4 paragraphs for the story.
The rest will just give you an informed opinion instead of a prejudiced one

Thanks mang.

[MagicNakor]

why?

Because she can't be kept alive without severe medical intervention, and I imagine all those surgeries and drugs keeping her in her current state aren't giving her a good quality of life. I believe the parents are selfish in keeping her alive.

How exactly are you going to do that? Starvation?

Or something more humane, involving IVs and various drugs.

[Barbarossa]

So more a case of "killing her", than "letting her die" then.

[Ava Estelle]

So more a case of "killing her", than "letting her die" then.

What difference does it make? She isn't 'alive' by any fair definition of the word anyway.

[Barbarossa]

Slippery slope. There's a huge difference between letting someone die and actually killing them.

3 month old babies can smile, and can appreciate visual, aural, and tactile stimulation. How is that not alive?

[ilw]

Slippery slope. There's a huge difference between letting someone die and actually killing them.

3 month old babies can smile, and can appreciate visual, aural, and tactile stimulation. How is that not alive?

think of the cost savings though

[ahctlucabbuS]

nm

[j2k4]

So more a case of "killing her", than "letting her die" then.

What difference does it make? She isn't 'alive' by any fair definition of the word anyway.

I've heard that phrase a few times too many in my life.