I just saw a programme about a man who received over 1000 years in prison for more than 80 counts of child pornography. I was wondering what people's opinions are on this penalty as it is the second longest ever.
I am not saying I think this man is right at all (in fact the very opposite) but does nobody find it strange that this man received a longer sentence than mass murderer's, child rapists/murderer's, serial killers etc. when he never physically hurt anyone (directly)? Surely distributing child porn is not as bad as raping and/or murdering a child or several children.
I feel I had better repeat, I am not on this man's side, just incase that did not come across there.
Bookmarks