no i don't think so.
there should to 2 threads... one is only rarity, and one is with the thing we're talking about now.
cause if there will be only one... ppl will give FTWR (for example) for TL... and it's not fair.
no i don't think so.
there should to 2 threads... one is only rarity, and one is with the thing we're talking about now.
cause if there will be only one... ppl will give FTWR (for example) for TL... and it's not fair.
@green goblin
i don`t think so freelech/donations for credit
we should stick to the four characteristics
but what is the best tracker for tv.
best for movies
games, and so on too hard to say this tracker is no1, all comes down to what you want, looking for.
Rarity is the whole point of that thread. People give TL away for free. Can your get ftwr for free right now? Not unless it's an outlier.
How good a tracker really is is another story for another thread (like Corey's), or for the tracker reviews. In fact in reviewing, I don't even think you should be rating a thread. It should be more like telling a lot about the tracker and letting the individual decide.
Last edited by Shadowfire; 01-27-2007 at 03:56 PM.
@3333 why not?
pls explain...
why dosen`t tl ban inv users for trading like ftwr did?
tell u why because they are more professional and care a lot more about their users...
well...at least that`s my opinion, i don`t want to offend anyone![]()
@shadowfire
ok let`s say that i agree but not entirely
the fact is that i don`t like ppl who trade tackers just for sport and never use them...
That's true, but that's beside the point.
In a way, banning people for invite trading is caring about users in the staff's eyes. It's being more strict about who actually gets let into the tracker. 3333's right; the two-thread thing we have right now is perfectly fine. I might agree with some of the individual rankings in the WIAW thread, but the overall concept is ok.
it's not fair just because getting TL is easier than FTWR.
i think Corey's thread should be the way you suggest, and this thread should stay like this, but with a little more attention to the content and speed (not too much).
i mean, there are many 4-4.5 trackers that wort sh*t.![]()
@shadowfire
true, but rarity dosen`t always mean quality
Bookmarks