What invites are worth (Improvements and suggestions Thread)

[gamer4eva]

I think the more trackers listed the better. FTN should defiantely move up to level 5. U*** is hard to get yes but is it really that good? A lot of people have felt sad after all the effort they put into getting U*** for it all to go to waste.

[Green Goblin]

I think the more trackers listed the better. FTN should defiantely move up to level 5. U*** is hard to get yes but is it really that good? A lot of people have felt sad after all the effort they put into getting U*** for it all to go to waste.

I agree more sites the better i hear of new ones every day, FTN should go up but wait till i have one, im hoping this will be my no.1

[walczanin]

yeah

level 5: FTN , SCT
level 4.5: EXIGO, RABBIT, FB, RP, REVOLT, UK-T
level 4: SWEDVDR, WB, NB, THORS
level 3.5: TT, PT, KG, HDBITS, FL, SB, RMVBUSTERS
level 3: SCC, TL(if the rank wouldnt focus only at rarity), IPLAY, RSR, PISEXY, BIMTMETV, CZONE, REVTT, TORRENTBITS

Thats just my idea of top 10-15 trackers,,,,,,,,,

[j0ker]

the thread is not valuing tracker, just rarity. that's a problem

[walczanin]

so lets not focus only at rarity, lets make it more complex......

[xandrew]

what invites are worth = value

[p3st]

the thread is great but it could use a little improvement

- add more trackers to each lvl (1 to 5);
- for each tracker listed there should be an review written so that everyone can get all the info that they need;
- reviews are ok in my opinion;
- and i have an idea about the tracker rating...
since there are a lot of trackers that are over-rated/under-rated why don`t u use a formula to calculate the rating:
the formula is : content (rating from 1 to 5) + speed (rating) + rarity (rating) + pre times (rating) / 4...
this way i think that the rating would be much more accurate because now the rating is based more on the rarity of the tracker an less on content and speed ...
ex: rSR (which i think it`s under-rated) : content+speed+rarity+pre/4 = 3.5+3.5+5+3.5/4 = 3.875
U*** (over-rated) : 4+4+5+3.5/4 = 4.125
i`m not saying that rSR is as good as U*** but the overall rating will be based not only on rarity or content, but on all the four characteristics
i don`t know if u like my idea, but i thought maybe it`s helpful

[walczanin]

actually that formula would be quite fair i guess......

[Alco23]

I think you may be onto something p3st... Let's continue along those lines.

[Green Goblin]

the problem is not everyone has the same speeds when it comes to uploading and downloading.
I will never ask for sct as i dont think i could keep a good ratio there, so sct is not worth much to me.
I think my no1 will be FTN, atm it is FSC.
so maybe an idea is to say what you need, to get the maximum out of a site, i keep seeing ppl wanting sct cause its no1, i think they wouldnt last a month if they got in there.
no point seeding at 50kbs if everybody else is finished d/l in 5 minutes.