Look for example torrentbits.ro, is torrentbits.ro better then TL, TB, (..)?
The awnser is no, it isnt, not even close, but the different is that trorrentbits.ro is 3.5 and tl is 2, and why is that? Because it was signups closed till 2015... Does that make him better? I guess it does...![]()
yeah but when trading you look for rarity rather than quality.
that's why there should be 2 different threads (but again, even on the worth trade... quality should be considered a little).
for example (i only heard that, really don't know), i understood that revolt is not a good site at all. but it's a 4 level tracker, ppl might trade their level 4 and get disappointed.
3333 is getting the point. The rest of you aren't.
When you are trading, you consider how hard it is to get an invite to the site you want. Quality at this point is not a factor at all.
I think we need an equal post with ranks etc but then only with how good the tracker is and not how hard it is to get in.
I know corey is making a topic with the trackers and what content they have etc but it's not really a rate of how good the sites are![]()
"Normal" is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work, driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job that you need so you can pay for the clothes, car, and the house that you leave empty all day in order to afford to live in it.
maybe after we got the 2 threads..
in each thread after the name there will be the other thread's rating.
for example on the worth trade:
Level 2:...TL (4)
it's level 2 on the worth, and 4 on quality.
I have the best idea how to improve it
you should do a poll on every site and every member who will get in can vote his opinion...
![]()
Bookmarks