Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

[Demigod]

harry potter is cool but jk rowling should do like starwars and show the events that happened leading up to tom riddles death

Interesting that you should say that because that's probably what will happen. Very rarely do they stop milking a franchise until it is sufficiently dry.

And plus, Harry Potter has earned billions for her and as per the saying "you can never have enough money," I just can't see her dropping Harry Potter after this book.

[WHRST]

Looks like leaks were real after all now that I have my copy but what she do with the books after the last chapter anyway, if there were to be more books. Though unlikely IMO.

[mikechrobot]

I have never been a big Harry Potter fan, and I truly can't understand the people that stand in lines for days (?) to get the book as early as possible, I find it really stupid, especially when there is a leaked version online

[tesco]

IMG_3631.jpg
Who could possibly read an entire book this way?
More importantly, who would take pictures of every single page of a book?

Incase anyone doesn't know that's one of the 77+100+79+140 jpeg pics of the book found on p2p.

[ilw]

I just finished reading the pdf version and i reckon the last book isn't that great. The plot is intentionally and annoyingly aimless for a big section of the book, very lucky coincidences keep happening all the way through it (even more than usual for HP books), and it seems JKR fairly pointlessly kills off one or more characters
slight spoiler:

Spoiler: Show

(loads of characters)

[cookiesandcream]

Got my book yesterday the time doors opened at the bookstore. Finished reading it now, it was pretty good, better than the 5th and 6th combined, but no where near as good as the first four, I think. But that's just my opinion. Well. That definitely closed the curtains. I must admit, whilst there are better books to read, Harry Potter should be one of those that I enjoy the most. I had much fun (few boring chapters here and there, but the rest made up for it) reading, and hopefully those who haven't, will have fun as well.

[Biggles]

So pretty much Hamlet with wands?

Lost track of these after about book four as my kids moved and started reading Philip Pullman.

[Michellin]

Read the book and I have to say it is one of the best books she wrote. But far too many deaths than expected and sometimes it had vague descriptions of where the hell they were

[WHRST]

Read the book and I have to say it is one of the best books she wrote. But far too many deaths than expected and sometimes it had vague descriptions of where the hell they were

Spoiler: Show

agreed but we all new more than two deaths were coming, though the way she described them I thought it might be ron, hermine or harry. Though I guess Snape and Voldemort qualify as the two main characters. Though bealtrix was killed too. She said she would lay a major part in the book but it was her family that played the major part not her specifically except for that gringots bit. though most of the deaths were pretty vauge, though besides the other semi-main characters that died she vaguly said fifty people were killed @ the end. Mad-Eye Moddy,Bealtrix,Hedwig,Fred,Lupin,Tonks,Snape and Voldemort of course. I guess I was right about Snapes loyalties after all.

Beware of reading if u have not read the book!!!!!!!!!!

mod edit - spoiler tags please

EDiT// figured everyone who was interested had read it by now

[colt45joe]

So pretty much Hamlet with wands?

No.