this is very true. it's funny 'cos when a new popular TV show like Lost gets pre'd, Ft.N will almost always have it first followed by CT and maybe even ST and then ScT a few seconds later -BUT- after about 10mins. ScT has over 50seeders on it and only 5 or 6 ot Ft.N, CT, etc.Originally Posted by SinWithin
ScT's a bit slower now when it comes to pre-times but thanks to ALLLLLLLLLLL the seedboxes there + .eu users with fast pipes, you'll max out 100% of the time!
Yea, on a side note, it's amazing how consistently good CT's pre times are, they usually beat FTN as well. If only they could improve their speeds, they would be one of the top two or three trackers, if not the best. They're seriously underrated as it is.
well, maybe those other trackers just really want to win the pre wars, but we all know what site is the best, don't we ?
BT Rep: +25
FTN is better on pre but on ScT you can get faster speeds.
FTN Lover
BT Rep: +2
Yeah I second the CT comment. It's really a nice tracker--if they managed to get some seedboxers in there, and speed went up imo it'd be better than sct.
(note: i have only used an sct account once, while my friend who had a seedbox was away on break, but uploaded 50 gigs and told me i could download 50 lol. i would still really like a freebie sct invite :-D. anyone out there? bueller? bueller?)
God of Warez
BT Rep: +13
why don't you give me the 2 accounts from those site and let me deside.
whahahahahahahahahaa
Chelsea Fan
BT Rep: +21
Ftn 4.5 Sct 5
correct. CT for example beats ScT's pretimes 6 out of 10 times but if you're leeching something off CT, you'd rarely max your speed. whereas with ScT, well, we all know the story there...
.......
BT Rep: +40
FTN is better on pre time
BT Rep: +23
FTN is good but SCT is faster and has more active torrents and community hands down
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks