![Quote](https://i.filesharingtalk.com/misc_fst/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Barbarossa
Good point.
Binge drinking has become the scourge of the English (British?) town centres at night.
If they had only just invented alcohol, it would be a banned substance. I dunno what the answer is.
![Emo](//i.filesharingtalk.com/smilies/emo.gif)
Wow, let's be thinking about that. We can discount people who die/are injured as a direct result of their own drinking. The same as we do for smokers. So what are we left with in terms of people who are directly affected by the drinking of others.
It is impossible not to be affected by someone who is smoking in your direct vicinity. The more it goes on the greater the effect, the closer to them the greater the effect. Tho' possibly not as directly proportionate as one would have thought. Once the room is full of poison it's pretty much full of poison.
However it is entirely possible to sit in a room with other people drinking and for it to have no effect at all, other than having a laugh. It happens to most people, most of the time. Even if there is fighting or whatever it is entirely possible to walk away from it.
Yes some people get caught up in it, however my "guess" would be that less poeple are affected by others drinking than are affected by others smoking.
The pictures of boys fighting in the street are dramatic, however in the overall scheme of people taking a wee shandy, just how big a percentage are we talking here. It is also a reasonably specific demographic we are talking about here. 40 year old woman rarely rampage through the streets of Auchterarder.
Again I have no figures to support this, just an intuitive reaction. I suspect the survival rates from an A&E on a Saturday night are significantly better than the oncology ward in the same hospital.
Bookmarks