Scn V Rts

[Detale]

It is because they are new trackers...RTS is almost a month old and SCN is two weeks old. and Definitely they will be better someday.

Hopefully, but not definitely... I don't understand what's all the hype too... SCN had similar packs as FTN but renamed as SCN's. Shame on you.

They are still both VERY good trackers. The number of torrents does not mean a better tracker, look at Bit Soup The speed of the uploaders is a factor and both sites have awesome upload staff. I would say at this stage RTS is ahead by about umm 2 weeks. For the trackers to be so new they are AMAZING. IMO tanother factor is the staff, both sites have an awesome staff who are VERY friendly and Very helpful when needed. Oh and dude I don't know how long you've been doing this but most trackers have the same 5hit on them, hate to have to break the news. As long as they put the files together on one torrent they can name it whatever they like

let them both go to hell .
FTN FTW

Wow are you jaded or what?

[jaqozo]

I just don't like sites where sysops put silly restrictions for recruiting members , like "show me a proof of seedbox and I'll let you get in" (rts) , or "show me that your upload speed is above 80 KB/s, and welcome" (scn) . Also I don't like recruiting of new members in the trading room . But that's my opinion, these sites aren't mine , the sysops may do anything they want . And I don't want to be a member of these sites , I'm pretty sure I can download any of their torrents from their original locations .

[sert]

I just don't like sites where sysops put silly restrictions for recruiting members , like "show me a proof of seedbox and I'll let you get in" (rts) , or "show me that your upload speed is above 80 KB/s, and welcome" (scn) . Also I don't like recruiting of new members in the trading room . But that's my opinion, these sites aren't mine , the sysops may do anything they want . And I don't want to be a member of these sites , I'm pretty sure I can download any of their torrents from their original locations .

I almost agree entirely with jaqozo. I didn't like at all their requirements to register.

Not only that but I find them pointless, as I can show you client screenshot with upload speed more than 1mb/s, with only 2 minutes of image editing.

Nevertheless its their site and they can impose whatever they like, I am not personally a trackers' collector and therefore I do not need any more sites with scene content; I am full of those.

Just a point: to setup good scene tracker you need to have all kinds of connections, not only the fastest ones, you need balance.

PS good luck to both.

[poopoohead]

SCN is way better, no offense to rts.

[metal maniac]

SCN is better by far!

[evilpants]

scn

[kyushizzl]

even though rts opened doors 2 weeks ahead, they are almost even in members and torrents now. rts seems to have problems recruiting new members and sometimes i get problems entering the site. also rts had only few new uploads recently. i think speed is also better at scn. i guess we will just have to wait a little longer to tell which ones better but the mafia theme is something that really caught my attention, which makes me hit that page much more often than rts.

i wonder why rts irc is sooo damn quiet...another plus for scn!

staff is great in both

[livelysory]

i guess SCN is better...but in time RTS will become a great tracker too...
both trackers are at beggining..so you can`t judge them very hard

[X]

lately rts hasn't released much.... and leeched much either... scn has fewer users but four times leecher then RTS... hopefully RTS picks up soon

[KFlint]

i changed my mind after having access to SCN, it is already pretty cool!

it is true that RTS doesn't have enough leechers..but that will become a great site for sure

i can seed easily on SCN, and the 4x upload multiplier + free leech is great at the moment