sct is better, ftn makes u seed 1:1, sct does not. FTn doesn't have that many peers/seeders anyhow. All of these make a hell of a diference when you are trying to get files fast or get them elsewhere.
BT Rep: +8
sct is better, ftn makes u seed 1:1, sct does not. FTn doesn't have that many peers/seeders anyhow. All of these make a hell of a diference when you are trying to get files fast or get them elsewhere.
TDI lover
BT Rep: +65
if U like h&rs you should use kazaaOriginally Posted by EV0LUTI0N
ftn i 2x better then ScT and 100x easier to seed
BT Rep: +8
if U like h&rs you should use kazaa
Why would something be easier to seed?
Simply because it isn't well seeded already
Isn't that the reason public trackers and the low level trackers don't work?
The only thing FTN is good for is the fact that sometimes torrents pre there before they get to SCT OR the fact that some files are free. AND even if they do pre B4, it's so underseeded that there policy is you must seed to 1:1 ratio or for a few days. Why doesn't SCT do this. They don't have to because they are so overseeded, they just don't give a damn. This means if you have a box or want to move those files elsewhere you have to
a.seed to FTN's rules
b.stop torrent ,copy files,seed again and probably limit your UL to FTN, big PITA
C.You should know all of this, and I pity you for it.
Period,dot,end.
Poster
BT Rep: +35
u can just say wat u want and u will definitely will get it
simply it is UK-t
English only in sigs please
Poster
BT Rep: +12
I think that sonofabitch backed out.. He found out how valuable u**** is finally.. damn! i could have got ftn+oink big buffer with that uk-t maybe..
Posting Permissions
ftn i 2x better then ScT and 100x easier to seed 
Bookmarks