what's new or different in SCN & RTS ?

[bytetorrent]

i have both accounts... both are shit...

maybe after an year we can discuss this again !

[Cmon]

I don't see anything so special/different about them, except SCN's theme

[jaqozo]

rts ? come on, it's a dead site . what is different on it? two things :
1) about 200 torrents, about 50% of them have the following stats : 1 seeder, 0 leechers, 0 snatches, the uploader is not connectable
2)you can't change the email , so you can't trade this worthless account w/o giving your email account, but i'm sure some of the mods there are waiting for the right moment to change their email and to trade it .

[XTorrenter]

I heard ScN is a great site that is supposed to be as good as FTN in the future so you should get invited as soon as possible

[zorms]

I have tried RTS and it looks really dead..
I would kill for an SCN invite so I can compare

[BLaZiN]

rts - well the amount of problems they been havin and failed to sort and lack of leechers just makes it impossible for that place to grow into somthing good as for SCN the place is well worked out and has decent speeds, i like it alot.

rts vs SCN - No comparison

[jaqozo]

rumplestiltski , yep, i recall one of rts problems was a ddos attack, which eventually was a waste of time, as those attackers could spend their effort on more established site than a dead one lol

[ilya28071992]

well as a member of both i got to site that currenly i like scn better...

freeleech and uploadX4 for more than a month now if not mistaken now that's a way to start a tracker.. RTS doesn't have any leechers although the design is awesome but it's too risky for me to try to download something cuz there is no one i could seed it too...

i expect a goof future for SCN and if it's gonna be the next FTN i am lucky to be a member there