Impeach Bush

[bigboab]

Somebody will say it is a plant! I'm a peach bush.

[Infested Cats]

Come one, come all.

[nikita69]

frankly i didn't vote. no option provided

"I'm no flag-waver, no patriot, and am fully aware that venality, brutality, and hypocrisy are imprinted on the leaden soul of every state. But when a country ceases to be merely a country and becomes an empire, then the scale of operations changes dramatically. So may I clarify that I speak as a subject of the American Empire? I speak as a slave who presumes to criticise her king." from my neighbour and couldn't have said it better.

[razorsharp013]

Originally posted by nikita69@27 September 2003 - 16:23
frankly i didn't vote. no option provided

"I'm no flag-waver, no patriot, and am fully aware that venality, brutality, and hypocrisy are imprinted on the leaden soul of every state. But when a country ceases to be merely a country and becomes an empire, then the scale of operations changes dramatically. So may I clarify that I speak as a subject of the American Empire? I speak as a slave who presumes to criticise her king." from my neighbour and couldn't have said it better.

Again, well said Nikita.
I've only now discovered this poll and if you've paid attention to any of my other posts relating to this topic my vote should be obvious.

[Calvarian2003]

Since I'm not an American citizen I won't bias the actual poll by voting. I'm not sure if Bush should be impeached, personally. He claims that he is a religious man but he clearly has been biased by the oil men.

I don't disagree with the war in Iraq or Afghanistan though. How foolish is the Western World to allow countries to not only support but encourage terrorism while we all stand by watching, and even HELPING them by continuing to give them financial aid!

Not only that, the disgusting human rights' abuses that occur in such countries go completely without mention in the media. To think that the Pope has expressed his disagreement with the US War on Terror numerous times, yet has never ever criticised the actions of Saddam Hussein which resulted in the deaths of over one million people. ONE MILLION. How can any decent person, who's been brought up in the relatively lap of luxury in a Western country, where we enjoy the best standard of living and the most rights in the world, and claim that removing that bigoted, violent warmonger was as BAD thing? What is wrong with these people?!

Personally, Bush disappoints me. Quite frankly, I support the view that American fighter pilots allowed Osama bin Laden's convoy to escape into Pakistan on orders of the Bush Administration, so as not to offend the House of Saud royal family. The hell with them! If the Middle East didn't have oil, it would be of no use to anyone. The majority of the land is desolate and barren.

Forget seeking out other sources. We have the technology and the money to eliminate our need for fossil fuels altogether right now. It'd be better for the environment and we wouldn't have any reason to place ourselves in jeopardy by giving wealth to the crazed violent DICTATORS of the Middle East.

Thought for the day: It's easy to criticise your government when they aren't threatening to massacre you and your family for doing so.

[ForbiddenDNA]

Bush is a great president..

He gone through a lot of $hit, to become a president..

So, no impeaching..

[vidcc]

Originally posted by ShockAndAwe^i^@17 June 2003 - 03:38
I don't think it's fair that foreign nationals get to vote on wether our president should be impeached or not.
C'mon... Saddam was either the dumbest dictator ever not opening the country up to inspections when he didn't have them or their very well hidden or a they've been moved.
Simple as that!

do you think for one moment bush would allow ANY other country to inspect America's weapons ? even if the UN decreed it

[hobbes]

Originally posted by vidcc+1 January 2004 - 18:42--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (vidcc &#064; 1 January 2004 - 18:42)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-ShockAndAwe^i^@17 June 2003 - 03:38
I don&#39;t think it&#39;s fair that foreign nationals get to vote on wether our president should be impeached or not.
C&#39;mon... Saddam was either the dumbest dictator ever not opening the country up to inspections when he didn&#39;t have them or their very well hidden or a they&#39;ve been moved.
Simple as that&#33;

do you think for one moment bush would allow ANY other country to inspect America&#39;s weapons ? even if the UN decreed it[/b][/quote]
Do you understand the context in which the UN demanded weapons inspections?

Iraq had invaded Kuwait and needed to be forcefully removed. The weapons inspections were a measure taken to ensure that Iraq didn&#39;t do it again after the coalition forces returned home.

These inspections weren&#39;t decided on arbitrarily. You lose a war, you pay a certain price.

[vidcc]

Originally posted by hobbes+1 January 2004 - 18:32--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (hobbes &#064; 1 January 2004 - 18:32)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by vidcc@1 January 2004 - 18:42
<!--QuoteBegin-ShockAndAwe^i^

@17 June 2003 - 03:38
I don&#39;t think it&#39;s fair that foreign nationals get to vote on wether our president should be impeached or not.
C&#39;mon... Saddam was either the dumbest dictator ever not opening the country up to inspections when he didn&#39;t have them or their very well hidden or a they&#39;ve been moved.
Simple as that&#33;

do you think for one moment bush would allow ANY other country to inspect America&#39;s weapons ? even if the UN decreed it

Do you understand the context in which the UN demanded weapons inspections?

Iraq had invaded Kuwait and needed to be forcefully removed. The weapons inspections were a measure taken to ensure that Iraq didn&#39;t do it again after the coalition forces returned home.

These inspections weren&#39;t decided on arbitrarily. You lose a war, you pay a certain price. [/b][/quote]
yes i do understand fully, however my point was do you really think bush would allow inspections and if he did do you not think he would hide weapons?.
don&#39;t misunderstand me on this ...i think saddam was and is an evil man and i am glad to see the back of him, however he was doing what most leaders would do.
so he invaded another country...hasn&#39;t the USA done that in the past ? for whatever justification.
We in the USA should look at ourselves a bit closer and stop thinking that we are the only place in the world to be without sin.
the USA is the only country to ever have dropped an atom bomb on human beings...and we did it twice...and yet the justification for not allowing other contries to have these weapons is that they would use them.

my personal belief was that this war was about oil....there are dictators just as bad as saddam out there but noting is done about them..just so happens that these countries don&#39;t have any monetary gain in liberation (but then what gives us the right to say how another country operates )
IN JEST the world has the right to freedom, justice and the pursiut of the american way

[hobbes]

Youre&#39; kind of rambling all over the place.

If the US were a fully vanquished country and security forces were poised outside our borders saying comply with these sanctions or bear the consequences, Bush would allow the inspections, he would have to.

I doubt that he would have decided to gold plate the White House and add his visage to Mount Rushmore, while US citizens were dying by the thousands under sanctions.

Basically, Saddam thought that posturing to the world was more important than the lives of his citizens. I don&#39;t see that in Bush or any American Preisdent.

So, "yes" he would if the people is supposed to be providing for are suffering.