No more bitterness...
I voted lvl 2, since they just gave out 2 invites to each of their users last week...
No more bitterness...
I voted lvl 2, since they just gave out 2 invites to each of their users last week...
BitMeTV is so easy to get into...VIP's get so many invites once a friend of mine had 8 invites.....what are you talking about..?
Just look around...how many giveaways have there been for BitMeTV...Have you ever thought that the tracker might be under-rated..??
Now i no what ur gona say would u trade an SCN invite for a BitMeTV invite the answer would most likely be NO..Now the reason for that is simple..
SCN is new has not made a name for its self yet in the torrent community and very few torrents + seeders/leechers however that doesnt effect the rarity now does it
The ratings are made for the current status or for the one from 2 months ago?
Did they gave those invites 2 months ago? I never use it so I have no idea, but I still think it's not that hard, & with "invites could be used only by people with accounts 10 weeks old, 250 GB upload and ratio 1.25" & (was) 4x upload + free leech, so no, it's not hard, just my opinion
Just a heads up to those who don't want to get any warnings...
From Patriot's instructions... You have to be a member for at least 2 months here in the BitTorrent Invites section to vote... Since it takes 1 month before you get access here in the invites section, you must have signed up here in FST no later than 04-25-07 to vote in this poll.
Oops, a warning will go towards me... That's it, if I'm not paying enough attention... But still, I claim that the rarity rating for SCN shouldn't be lower than 4... I compared to Oink for sustaining level 5, but maybe level 5 is too much... But level 2 or 3 no way.
Bookmarks