do u think j2k4 is a bush fan? ~47 posts in this thread suggest so.
Greater Demon
do u think j2k4 is a bush fan? ~47 posts in this thread suggest so.
Never miss a good chance to shut up
Looking for loopholes
J'Pol
Apologies, I missed it the first time - still it bears repeating.
Unfortunately, the letters in my department are not for external consumption, but we do endeavour to keep a flicker of creativity alive to pass the long hours.
Max Weber's 'dead hand of bureaucracy' seemingly hit British Gas and was unable to get back out, thankfully leaving the rest of us alone.
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum
en(un)lightened
After a qualified fashion, though such qualification makes no difference to most.Originally posted by b4icu@15 January 2004 - 20:38
do u think j2k4 is a bush fan?
You must be VERY new here, eh?
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Why, do you think she is a homosexual.Originally posted by b4icu@16 January 2004 - 01:38
do u think j2k4 is a bush fan? ~47 posts in this thread suggest so.
Rarely see ~ used in a mathematical context, it is to your credit.
Looking for loopholes
Not sure exactly.Originally posted by b4icu@16 January 2004 - 00:38
do u think j2k4 is a bush fan? ~47 posts in this thread suggest so.
Although I hesitate to speak on his behalf, he appears to view Bush as a less ghastly choice than what was on offer but as far as I can tell that is no ringing endorsement.
I can only guess that the choices must have been pretty grim though
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum
No need to apologise, I certainly didn't write it and claim no credit for posting it here. It was a chap at work who pointed it out to meOriginally posted by Biggles@16 January 2004 - 01:52
J'Pol
Apologies, I missed it the first time - still it bears repeating.
Unfortunately, the letters in my department are not for external consumption, but we do endeavour to keep a flicker of creativity alive to pass the long hours.
Max Weber's 'dead hand of bureaucracy' seemingly hit British Gas and was unable to get back out, thankfully leaving the rest of us alone.
It was not my intention to mention my previous post. I am saddened that shiny bonce boy felt that he had to, however he is a fan of pedantry in the true sense of the word. So it comes as little surprise that he felt the need to demonstrate his knowledge of the banal.
I see too much drivel repeated here. To see a work of art (such as that) repeated was if anything refreshing.
Some people cannot help but demonstrate their knowledge of the trivial. If that is what makes them happy and helps them live with the fact that their dome is reminiscent of a Mosque, then who are we to judge.
It was not just me asking for the proof. You still have not proven your claims to anyone on this board.You are not due the information, simply because it is you.
Bzzt, spelling mistake again. Good job I am not as desperate as you to deflect criticisms that I would make a habit of pointing such things out.Please give up on the 'bated breath, too, or you will surely pass out.
But you didn't break any of the rules in this post, so no need. However, when you do ...Don't forget to report this post, now!
Here is a link that shows otherwise. He gets $150,000 a year from them, minimum. Hardly "no financial interest in Halliburton of any kind and haven't had now for over three years" as Cheney claimed on Meet the Press. He also still holds stock, and when faced with the evidence said he would donate some of the money to charity. Dosen't really fit with his other statement of having "severed all my ties with the company, gotten rid of all my financial interests".Ah, yes.
Baseless!
Care to retort?
en(un)lightened
What if your source fits my definition of "liberal, left-wing...?
That store you patronize?
The one selling "blanket statements" and "broad brushes"?
They'll sell to conservatives, too.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
My source makes no value or subjective judgements (as yours did with it's vague definition of "poor"). It merely states facts.What if your source fits my definition of "liberal, left-wing...?
You are aware of facts aren't you? Those things other people use to prove a case? Oh, thought not
You are making yourself appear even more foolish by endlessly repeating this stance which is patently unsustainable. Not that I mind, but isn't it a tad embarassing for you? I am really concerned on your behalf
Oh as a side note, you will notice that Cheney's own spokesperson acknowledges the payments.
Doh!
en(un)lightened
None of that matters, you see?Originally posted by 1234@16 January 2004 - 12:43
My source makes no value or subjective judgements (as yours did with it's vague definition of "poor"). It merely states facts.What if your source fits my definition of "liberal, left-wing...?
You are aware of facts aren't you? Those things other people use to prove a case? Oh, thought not
You are making yourself appear even more foolish by endlessly repeating this stance which is patently unsustainable. Not that I mind, but isn't it a tad embarassing for you? I am really concerned on your behalf
Oh as a side note, you will notice that Cheney's own spokesperson acknowledges the payments.
Doh!
My new blanket covers all of it.
Glad to have finally discovered the secret of your questionable success.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks