God's Eye

**Mr JP Fugley** · 10-05-2007, 07:10 PM

I don't think he understand mate. He seems to think that omnipresent means actually being everything, as opposed to being everywhere.

**blackbird** · 10-05-2007, 07:11 PM

Originally Posted by manicgeek

Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley

The question makes no sense. Being omnipresent he couldn't possibly have a corporeal form.

Being omnipotent he could create one if he so wished, but that would not be omnipresent. He himself would remain omnipresent, the body however would inhabit a finite place within space and time.

Sorry but I think this is all pretty much self-evident stuff here

Ah! I see you think he just created an eye like ?

Maybe bored one afternoon and thought I know I'll knock up an eye... I wonder how big I should make it ?

i was an atheist .. but when i think about the begining of the universe and stuffs like that .. i belive in god

**Mr JP Fugley** · 10-05-2007, 07:15 PM

Originally Posted by blackbird

Originally Posted by manicgeek

Ah! I see you think he just created an eye like ?

Maybe bored one afternoon and thought I know I'll knock up an eye... I wonder how big I should make it ?

i was an atheist .. but when i think about the begining of the universe and stuffs like that .. i belive in god

What's interesting is that quantum physics tells us that by observing events we influence them and that the normal order of cause and effect is not a strict rule. We are now starting to observe the very beginings of the Universe so it's possible that we are also influencing it.

**kaffeine** · 10-05-2007, 07:19 PM

yep, and also, the composition of things and the way we perceive reality is not really how it is, it's only a representation of it being perceived by our limited senses. In fact, nobody knows how the reality really is, the only known fact is that it is NOT how we perceive it.

**Something Else** · 10-05-2007, 07:21 PM

**Mr JP Fugley** · 10-05-2007, 07:24 PM

Originally Posted by kaffeine

yep, and also, the composition of things and the way we perceive reality is not really how it is, it's only a representation of it being perceived by our limited senses.

That's more to do with the limitations of our senses than the fundamental nature of reality however it is a good point well made. How can we analyze properly if we can't observe properly.