FTN loses speed

[Kyl3KK]

It's only a tad slow on the index page when I'm seeding, but thats all.

[XS75]

FTN is being slow as usual
ScT is fast loading, less then a second at tops, but you cant expect anything less from a webserver and database server connected to 100Mbit and 1Gbit with Gzipped pages.

[bwaduk]

ftn is nice and fast here even while im maxing my upload even on https

[Koeckebacker]

i noticed, that the ftn browsing times are getting worse and worse for me.

there is a discussion going on in the ftn forum, but the experiences there are quite controversial. some say it's slow - some say it's fast as usual.
maybe it's my pipe, or my isp or whatever
but when i compare it with sct, it's like a ferrari and a skoda (ot: yeah i know, there are fast skodas dear east-europeans, but i mean the smaller slower ones )

well, i guess it will change pretty soon and come back to normal.

how are your browsing times on ftn?
i want to figure out wether it's my fault somehow, or if it's the site.

You're right. It's slow. Takes about 3 seconds to load a page.

[XS75]

i noticed, that the ftn browsing times are getting worse and worse for me.

there is a discussion going on in the ftn forum, but the experiences there are quite controversial. some say it's slow - some say it's fast as usual.
maybe it's my pipe, or my isp or whatever
but when i compare it with sct, it's like a ferrari and a skoda (ot: yeah i know, there are fast skodas dear east-europeans, but i mean the smaller slower ones )

well, i guess it will change pretty soon and come back to normal.

how are your browsing times on ftn?
i want to figure out wether it's my fault somehow, or if it's the site.

You're right. It's slow. Takes about 3 seconds to load a page.

If find it funny how Brandon is always saying, ScT doesnt need that much hardware and tha the FTN server could host a site like ScT. Well right now imagine if ScT was on an FTN like server in Malaysia? ScT has 90000 peers to FTNs <15 000 and 15000 users to FTNs <6000.

[Brandon]

You're right. It's slow. Takes about 3 seconds to load a page.

If find it funny how Brandon is always saying, ScT doesnt need that much hardware and tha the FTN server could host a site like ScT. Well right now imagine if ScT was on an FTN like server in Malaysia? ScT has 90000 peers to FTNs <15 000 and 15000 users to FTNs <6000.

I notice the anti FTN/Pro SCT crew is at it again. I never fail to see both darkness and PolarBear at it. PolarBear, I suggest you find something more productive to do with your time than compare routing on two torrent servers, and darkness I suggest you do a little research on both server specs and routing. We'll end up raising the limit, and you'll see

[MrLazy]

cmon guys .. Brandon is right. Im sure you guys know All trackers have their advantages and disadvantages .. nothing is perfect in this world ..lets just face it..

Both trackers are perfect just the way they are, im personally not a member of FTN nor ScT (seen ScT from friends). They both provide us with a welcoming and comfortable community for us to share files and meet new people... I've heard many nice things from both trackers. Of course different people have different opinions, but if it's inappropriate plz do try to keep it to yourself ..theres no need to offend others.

thanks for your time.

[Presto]

I wish I could test out FTN speeds. Cough. Hmm..

[dragos]

I wish I could test out FTN speeds. Cough. Hmm..

you'll just get pissed cuz you grow a beard until you can see the new releases

[Kyl3KK]

FTN is only slow for me when seeding, but then again, so is everything... it's not that slow, hell its not slow at all, its just a teeeeeeensy bit slower then ScT.

I wish I could test out FTN speeds. Cough. Hmm..

You deserve it more then any person I can think of that doesn't already have it.