Once privs are disabled they're disabled.
That's it for you at this forum mate.
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
Once privs are disabled they're disabled.
That's it for you at this forum mate.
╚════╩═╬════╝
indeed,Originally Posted by optimus_prime
omg holy shit he went 203 pxls over, bann the fukker
are you kidding skizo?
Please say you are....
you who paraded with imageshack dead link images the size of any screen.
I regard this as over reaction, he has apologized for his MEGA criminal act.
Let it slide.
ffs
Last edited by 100%; 10-11-2007 at 09:02 PM.
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
Rules are rules boy. Doesn't matter if it's 1 pixel
╚════╩═╬════╝
your 1 pixel remark took up a total of 300pxls (wide)
(_8(I)
At least know what you're talking about if you're going to argue the point.indeed,
omg holy shit he went 3 pxls over, bann the fukker
are you kidding skizo?
Please say you are....
you who paraded with imageshack dead link images the size of any screen.
I regard this as over reaction, he has apologized for his MEGA criminal act.
Let it slide.
ffs
Sigs can be 150px in height. 353 puts him at over twice that.
Spoiler: Show
The sig infraction also isn't something that will cause a member to have their account privileges disabled by itself. This guy has a list of offenses already in his short 2 month membership. When he received a measly (and standard) 1 point infraction for his sig being enormous, the culmination of so my infractions (4 different offenses in 2 days) in such a short time disables the account automatically. That's half the point in the infraction system. Besides, he still hasn't commented on why, after receiving the warning yesterday, did he put the sig back again.
He is also still asking questions about when his privileges will come back. Again, if he would take the time to read, he would see that the infraction only lasts 10 days and expires on 10-21-07.
After all this, this nitwit still isn't reading what's right in front of him.
Ffs, indeed....
yo
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
And what difference does that make pray tell, it's not like it's in my sig or anything so I can make the post as wide or as tall as I want, unless someone has brought in a rule about the height or width of posts which I don't believe they have, or have they. You tell me. Skizo's right the guy broke the rules, fact. We are a draconian board, we need draconian rules.
(_8(I)
Sure, you can. The board will also resize it if it's an image.
The point is that sigs won't take up an unnecessary amount of room and distract from the true purpose of the board - communication through posts.
The file size requirements keep threads from taking a mammoth amount of time to load.
You know all this...
yo
╚════╩═╬════╝
This board needs an accountant, and a lawyer.
welcome to fst
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 19
Posts: 281
BT Rep: +5
Last edited by 100%; 10-11-2007 at 09:22 PM.
(_8(I)
Don't forget infraction points.
yo
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
Indeed, Skizo.
Point is the chap was warned repeatedly and chose to ignore it. What are you supposed to do.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
) in such a short time disables the account automatically. That's half the point in the infraction system. Besides, he still hasn't commented on why, after receiving the warning yesterday, did he put the sig back again.
Bookmarks