i think it only worked coz the torrent sizes were small and on big torrents there r a lot of partial seeders
heard that cheaters can be caught easily with a script when they cheat in small torrents
maybe some1 verify that
i think it only worked coz the torrent sizes were small and on big torrents there r a lot of partial seeders
heard that cheaters can be caught easily with a script when they cheat in small torrents
maybe some1 verify that
That could be 1 of the main reasons.
if you upload 40gigs on a file only snatched 10 times and is 90MB in size it makes it a little too obvious. Where on most sites the files are avg almost 1 gig in size so its harder to detect.
The oink scripts were pretty good at catching cheats but not always accurate.
I beleive sites like bitmetv and theplace use fairly similiar scripts.
as far as I know OiNK scripts kicked a fair share of legitimate users and in my opinion its not worth the hassle... just look at what happened with torrentbytes after it blocked all iraeli IPs for cheating.. IMO this kind of script can be used to pin point the cheaters but never to automatically kick users for cheating. Kicking one honest user for cheating is not worth ten cheaters out of a tracker in my opinion..
Just go to TBDev. You will see all the original cheat detection stuff there, including some enhancements.
As for cheat detection, it is not a refined art form. I can categorically say that a genuine client can have a funny five minutes, where it can misbehave, which would make an inadequate script think it was dealing with a Ratio Booster.
I should know, as I invented the cheat script in the first place, alongside Purple.
sorry for the spam but nice mr fox rofl
4d7920686f76657263726166742069732066756c6c206f662065656c73
Bookmarks