So I've been thinking...

[beat]

Ok Skizo, sorted.

[spark]

Didn't Grind$oFine create a thread awhile back about the rarity and levels FOR actual invites? I can't find it anywhere.

https://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bit...m-style-241103

[amirji]

The WIAW thread is way out of whack.

If the topic is "What Invites Are Worth", then sites which have invites disabled for all users should be ranked "10", correct?

Black-cats, E****, Pisexy and several others have disabled invites indefinitely, so why should I not move their ranking to "10"?

Discuss.

TorrentLeech. They have disabled invites atm, and it seems for a while.

I think I asked about the same question a while back.

[civeta]

I believe you should simply move the sites that closed their invites up in the ranks little by little. They may open up their invites/registrations again so moving them straight up to level 10 would be absurd. Unless you know the plans of the trackers, you should assume for now that this invite closure is only short-term. Of course this may not be true, which is why time will tell how far they move up in the ranks.

[pone44]

I think its all about what people want-content wise and want to know which site is more secure(private) if thats what people are concerned with? I dont trade or have any elite sites so i cant vouch for them but i do believe the thread is correct to my knowing. I cant find invites on certain tracks, others are easy.

[mrnobody]

The WIAW thread is way out of whack.

If the topic is "What Invites Are Worth", then sites which have invites disabled for all users should be ranked "10", correct?

Black-cats, E****, Pisexy and several others have disabled invites indefinitely, so why should I not move their ranking to "10"?

Discuss.

Even though the topic says, "What Invites Are Worth", the content has been based on rarity of invite+ account. And, thus as many FST users refer the WIAW thread has turned to be "traders bible" . So, in traditional way, no, blackcats or any other tracker which have invite disabled would not go lvl 10. Because, still there are plenty of account for trade. However, once invites are disabled i do think the tracker should have something next to them denoting that the invites are currently disabled.

On the other hand, if we were to follow word for word and focus only on Invites i think invite disabled tracker should be excluded from levels. Say, there could be "Currently Invites Disabled" and next to the tracker name we still can give their previous level...which i think will make more sense.

---

Also, i think there should be a requirement to get into WIAW thread. Say, a tracker must have xxxx # of users and/or yyyy # of torrents. Otherwise, people can create their own tracker, close signup + disable invites, and then possibly make a review by themself, wait till it gets to lvl 10, and then trade accounts themself. I know any tracker won't get into lvl 10 that easy but just an example.

P.S. just read the first post so sry if decision has already been made.

[civeta]

I don't think the "Currently Invites Disabled" category should be implied, but it's a start. It might be smart to put that kind of special label on it, but not a whole section dedicated to that. I think a lot of people look at the WIAW list as a bible, as squirr3l said, and if there is no rank to the tracker they may find it worthless.

[Grind$oFine]

Didn't Grind$oFine create a thread awhile back about the rarity and levels FOR actual invites? I can't find it anywhere.

https://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bit...m-style-241103

I don't understand why this discussion was brought up...

I made a WIAW based on just invite systems... putting the closed sites at level 10, explaining they should be there for the exact reason you just said...

BCG invites are harder to get than FTN invites technically.
There's a huge discussion about this all there.
Including, a bunch of people disagree with my system,
and people asking to sticky the thread.
And YOU skizo saying no... with no explanation.

I don't mind that its not stickied, but why disapprove of it and then bring it up again here?

[mrnobody]

Grind, i think he didn't like having two different WIAW...it would be quite a bit confusing if you ask...coz two different people would moderate it, plus different people would participate in two different and thus WIAW and lvl's would not be consistent. But,perhaps now he is thinking about making some changes in the original WIAW...which is good thing

[raj3186]

Grind, i think he just wants to change the existing WIAW.

+1, Even i want to see some modifictions in the existing WIAW