Page 1 of 10 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 95

Thread: Flac vs mp3

  1. #1
    wrongun92's Avatar Love Life BT Rep: +8BT Rep +8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    In Front of the PC
    Posts
    438
    It seems a lot of people are into flac music. I have read rave reviews about flac format. So I decided to download some myself and test out how true this was.

    I really did not see much difference if at all between flac and mp3 vbr 192. Perhaps, it was the source of the flac but it seemed genuine enough. Perhaps, i need to download more of the flac format and my specific download did not do justice to this rave format.

    What do you feel about this?

  2. Music   -   #2
    Skiz's Avatar (_8(I)
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    CO
    Age
    46
    Posts
    22,943
    The quality of sound depends on much more than the quality of rip and encoding.

    You need to take into account your speakers, listening device, sound card, etc.

    If those devices are not up to par, then indeed you will not tell any difference.


    yo

  3. Music   -   #3
    S!X's Avatar L33T Member BT Rep: +5
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    7,131
    FLAC is what you want if you're burning cd's but for general listening I get V0 rips.

  4. Music   -   #4
    Living on the edge BT Rep: +4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    irc.p2p-irc.net/t**
    Posts
    499
    definitely flac has more quality than mp3 but it depend on ripping

  5. Music   -   #5
    Skiz's Avatar (_8(I)
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    CO
    Age
    46
    Posts
    22,943
    Quote Originally Posted by dave12 View Post
    definitely flac has more quality than mp3 but it depend on ripping

    FLAC or MP3 is the result of the ripping.


    yo

  6. Music   -   #6
    orfik's Avatar 20th Century Boy BT Rep: +3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    NY
    Age
    39
    Posts
    353
    The FLAC vs MP3 conversation is an ignorant one. Even if you don't believe that FLAC sounds better (which it does, and I'd bet a large sum of money the people who think it doesn't don't have the components to make that claim), it's an archival codec before anything else. You use it to keep perfect copies of CDs so that you don't need to disturb your physical media. From FLAC you can transcode to any of the lossy codecs and maintain the maximum amount of quality. You cannot transcode from lossy to lossy without a significant degradation in the file. Should some advanced lossy codec emerge in the future, you can still use those FLAC archives to convert to that, instead of being stuck with a lossy library technically inferior to the new codec. Take iterations of LAME: archive all your files in one generation of the codec and you're stuck with it.




    "Be easy, my ninja."


  7. Music   -   #7
    Skiz's Avatar (_8(I)
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    CO
    Age
    46
    Posts
    22,943
    People who wish to debate this subject, I usually send off to listen to a good acoustic song or album.

    Jack Johnson's "Taylor" is a great one.


    yo

  8. Music   -   #8
    orfik's Avatar 20th Century Boy BT Rep: +3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    NY
    Age
    39
    Posts
    353
    My epiphany song was Cyann & Ben - Guilty. The cymbals, the bass..




    "Be easy, my ninja."


  9. Music   -   #9
    Monkeee's Avatar Post Whore
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    3,393
    If your a casual listener of music, i doubt you'll even tell the remote difference of V0 from FLAC.

  10. Music   -   #10
    wrongun92's Avatar Love Life BT Rep: +8BT Rep +8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    In Front of the PC
    Posts
    438
    My source was Linkin Park and I listened in winamp and my earphones are pretty good

Page 1 of 10 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •