For A L L That Use P2p Or Share Files

[Fighter-X]

The RIAA is difficult to stop. We need to hit them physically like burn down there company, hack all their websites that promotes sueing and P2P stopping,Infect them with as much trojans and viruses, and start a whole crowd of people with pickets signs in front of the white house saying " The RIAA goes to far P2p forever!"

[silent h3ro]

The RIAA is difficult to stop. We need to hit them physically like burn down there company, hack all their websites that promotes sueing and P2P stopping,Infect them with as much trojans and viruses, and start a whole crowd of people with pickets signs in front of the white house saying " The RIAA goes to far P2p forever!"

Yea that will give us P2Pers a great reputation.

[Skiz]

...we have been labeled criminals...

"labeled" ??

We're downloading for free, what another is selling.

v. stole, (stl) sto·len, (stln) steal·ing, steals
v. tr.

1. To take without right or permission.

[Leviathan]

Right on Fighter X

They can try all the scare mongering they want but RIAA and all the other b.ullshit authorities wont be able to stop p2p. Basically the net was given to people too early, they should have done their homework before letting loose such an invention.

And as for downloading what someone’s selling, well I’m a music lover and just because I download does not mean I will stop buying music. Its means I wont get ripped off for buying crappy singles that I listen to just once.

The companies will just have to improve the deal they offer to the consumer – no more fat profits for doing nothing. Thanks to p2p we will be better off in the long run.

they can persecute us but p2p will never die!!! come get uz mofos !!!

[BigDaddy555]

what if your behind a firewall with a spoofed IP. Guess they can still see the name but not where its coming from.....

[atiVidia]

transparent proxies are your god

what happened to FST's proxy list???

[Skiz]

The companies will just have to improve the deal they offer to the consumer

[KazaaBoy]

Who ever said we should compromise with the RIAA and come up with a revenue is a degenerate balloon head. P2P is free and should remain that way. You cannot compromise with company's who are hungry for power and money.

Have you forgotten the typical man in a suite? Why should I pay for CD's that have maximum 3 good songs out of 17 and the whole album costs £18?

Why should my money go to someone who has three cars, two houses, a wife & a lover, a few million in their bank account, Cuban cigar on one hand and whiskey on the other.

I am just curious, off all the law suites that the RIAA filed and won - including settlements outside, how much of it went to any artists at all?

These types of people, their days of greed is over they know it and they fear it. We are taking control and they know it. P2P should never be paid for in any way by us. Advertisment is the only way of revenue which is not by us and if they refuse to accept it, TOUGH, we are in control now.

[Leviathan]

I certainly wont be feeling guilty if Simon Cowell wont be able to afford tailor made Armani t-shirts.

There is a danger though that ppl involved in p2p could sell out. If this happens the file sharing community will have to regroup elsewhere in cyberspace.

Thats the trouble with new ideas, you cant de-invent them. p2p is here to stay.

[bad]

Hey, this is my first post. I just wanted to say I sent my letter before I found and signed up here, I think it is a good idea. Yes this may be for the US for now, but, if we can make a change here (US) other countries will follow. Somebody has to lead before anybody can follow!!