Your Ad Here Your Ad Here
Page 1 of 6 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 55

Thread: Sites ranked level 10

  1. #1
    monk3y's Avatar Pirate's Life for me BT Rep: +30BT Rep +30BT Rep +30BT Rep +30BT Rep +30BT Rep +30
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Any other world
    Age
    31
    Posts
    1,528

    Question Mark

    NO! I am not talking about the rarity level, what i want to discuss is the
    [Content,Speed,Pre-Times] sites. which are :

    HDBits[10]
    TL[10]
    BitMeTV[10]
    ScT[10]
    TT[10]
    FTN[10]

    Do you think these sites deserve the Perfect 10 ( based on content, speed and pre times not anything else ) ?
    Do you think there are other sites who deserve to get a perfect 10 ?
    // edit : What do you think What and Waffles should be rated ?
    Last edited by monk3y; 01-05-2008 at 11:28 PM.

    Do not pm me requesting for invites as i have none to spare
    Signature & Avatar Rules

  2. BitTorrent   -   #2
    SaviouR's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +35BT Rep +35BT Rep +35BT Rep +35BT Rep +35BT Rep +35BT Rep +35
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    354
    i am surprisd KG doesnt have a perfect 10 for its contents ......

  3. BitTorrent   -   #3
    monk3y's Avatar Pirate's Life for me BT Rep: +30BT Rep +30BT Rep +30BT Rep +30BT Rep +30BT Rep +30
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Any other world
    Age
    31
    Posts
    1,528
    Quote Originally Posted by SaviouR View Post
    i am surprised KG doesn't have a perfect 10 for its contents ......
    Yea, in it's category it's the best :|

    Do not pm me requesting for invites as i have none to spare
    Signature & Avatar Rules

  4. BitTorrent   -   #4
    Poster BT Rep: +80BT Rep +80BT Rep +80BT Rep +80BT Rep +80BT Rep +80BT Rep +80BT Rep +80BT Rep +80BT Rep +80BT Rep +80BT Rep +80BT Rep +80BT Rep +80BT Rep +80BT Rep +80
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    nowhere
    Posts
    4,452
    Yes i do think all of the above mentioned site deserve [10] based on content, speed and pre times

    As for KG, it has awesome conent but speed isn't. And, there isn't any pre time for old movies lol

    ...and i think TT should get [10], it fuflils all requirement to it's best!

    edit: TT is [10]

    edit2: i think SCC should step one more to [10]
    Last edited by squirr3l; 01-05-2008 at 11:28 PM.

  5. BitTorrent   -   #5
    You can always do better... mostly on speed and pretimes

    but i'm sure those numbers are relative... not absolute...

    like HDbits is really #1 ... so if you have to line up all the trackers from 0 to 10, HDbits would be placed on 10... nothing can beat them...

    of course if all the files had at least one gbit seedbox sharing them would be the "perfection"... lol

  6. BitTorrent   -   #6
    NOLF's Avatar Love You Josefine! BT Rep: +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50BT Rep +50
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Age
    39
    Posts
    645
    Quote Originally Posted by SaviouR View Post
    i am surprisd KG doesnt have a perfect 10 for its contents ......
    My kinda guy, I totally agree

  7. BitTorrent   -   #7
    Artemis's Avatar ןɐɯɹou ǝq ʎɥʍ BT Rep: +3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    6,331
    The first intelligent ratings thread I have seen in awhile, actually I think though that the content etc. is up to the individual, I enjoy trackers that have a mix of the 0day scenestuff and packs that are made up by members.
    Everyone values content differently based on their personal interests, so what I find is a good tracker others may not like at all, but the content indicators are a good reference guide to what a tracker offers.

    4d7920686f76657263726166742069732066756c6c206f662065656c73


  8. BitTorrent   -   #8
    pro267's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +7BT Rep +7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,615
    I think the quality rating is subjective, based on the taste of the reviewer. The quality rating tends to be quite fixed as opposed to the rarity ranking where there are parties with interest that are trying to push the trackers up/down the list and make it more dynamic.

    As for KG, if it was only contents then it's definitely a 10. Pretimes make no difference on a tracker like KG as it's not a 0-day tracker, but tbh the speed could be somewhat better. So overall a 9 is a very good score for KG.
    546f74616c6c792072616e646f6d20746578742e20416d617a696e671f20696e6e69742e

  9. BitTorrent   -   #9
    Polarbear's Avatar deep funk BT Rep: +5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    behind the turntables
    Age
    46
    Posts
    3,658
    Quote Originally Posted by fusionz View Post
    NO! I am not talking about the rarity level, what i want to discuss is the
    [Content,Speed,Pre-Times] sites. which are :

    HDBits[10]
    TL[10]
    BitMeTV[10]
    ScT[10]
    TT[10]
    FTN[10]

    Do you think these sites deserve the Perfect 10 ( based on content, speed and pre times not anything else ) ?
    Do you think there are other sites who deserve to get a perfect 10 ?
    // edit : What do you think What and Waffles should be rated ?
    looking at content, speed and pretimes:

    hdbits: is there a better hd site?

    tl, sct, ftn: are there better 0-day sites?

    bitmetv: is there a better tv site?

    tt: is there a better site for trance?

    that's why they all deserve the best [10].


    waffles and what should be compared to oink[10], because it was the best.

    but they are too young to be rated yet. (ok, maybe a [7-8])

  10. BitTorrent   -   #10
    zxion's Avatar Taste Good BT Rep: +7BT Rep +7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    222
    Quote Originally Posted by Polarbear View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by fusionz View Post
    NO! I am not talking about the rarity level, what i want to discuss is the
    [Content,Speed,Pre-Times] sites. which are :

    HDBits[10]
    TL[10]
    BitMeTV[10]
    ScT[10]
    TT[10]
    FTN[10]

    Do you think these sites deserve the Perfect 10 ( based on content, speed and pre times not anything else ) ?
    Do you think there are other sites who deserve to get a perfect 10 ?
    // edit : What do you think What and Waffles should be rated ?
    looking at content, speed and pretimes:

    hdbits: is there a better hd site?

    tl, sct, ftn: are there better 0-day sites?

    bitmetv: is there a better tv site?

    tt: is there a better site for trance?

    that's why they all deserve the best [10].


    waffles and what should be compared to oink[10], because it was the best.

    but they are too young to be rated yet. (ok, maybe a [7-8])
    I agree with you, those are the sites that really set the bar on content, no matter how rare they are

Page 1 of 6 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •