Pirate's Life for me
BT Rep: +30
NO! I am not talking about the rarity level, what i want to discuss is the
[Content,Speed,Pre-Times] sites. which are :
HDBits[10]
TL[10]
BitMeTV[10]
ScT[10]
TT[10]
FTN[10]
Do you think these sites deserve the Perfect 10 ( based on content, speed and pre times not anything else ) ?
Do you think there are other sites who deserve to get a perfect 10 ?
// edit : What do you think What and Waffles should be rated ?
Last edited by monk3y; 01-05-2008 at 11:28 PM.
Poster
BT Rep: +35
i am surprisd KG doesnt have a perfect 10 for its contents ......
Pirate's Life for me
BT Rep: +30
Yea, in it's category it's the best :|Originally Posted by SaviouR
BT Rep: +80
Yes i do think all of the above mentioned site deserve [10] based on content, speed and pre times
As for KG, it has awesome conent but speed isn't. And, there isn't any pre time for old movies lol
...and i think TT should get [10], it fuflils all requirement to it's best!
edit: TT is [10]
edit2: i think SCC should step one more to [10]
Last edited by squirr3l; 01-05-2008 at 11:28 PM.
You can always do better... mostly on speed and pretimes
but i'm sure those numbers are relative... not absolute...
like HDbits is really #1 ... so if you have to line up all the trackers from 0 to 10, HDbits would be placed on 10... nothing can beat them...
of course if all the files had at least one gbit seedbox sharing them would be the "perfection"... lol
Love You Josefine!
BT Rep: +50
My kinda guy, I totally agree
¿ןɐɯɹou ǝq ʎɥʍ
BT Rep: +3
The first intelligent ratings thread I have seen in awhile, actually I think though that the content etc. is up to the individual, I enjoy trackers that have a mix of the 0day scenestuff and packs that are made up by members.
Everyone values content differently based on their personal interests, so what I find is a good tracker others may not like at all, but the content indicators are a good reference guide to what a tracker offers.
4d7920686f76657263726166742069732066756c6c206f662065656c73
Poster
BT Rep: +7
I think the quality rating is subjective, based on the taste of the reviewer. The quality rating tends to be quite fixed as opposed to the rarity ranking where there are parties with interest that are trying to push the trackers up/down the list and make it more dynamic.
As for KG, if it was only contents then it's definitely a 10. Pretimes make no difference on a tracker like KG as it's not a 0-day tracker, but tbh the speed could be somewhat better. So overall a 9 is a very good score for KG.
546f74616c6c792072616e646f6d20746578742e20416d617a696e671f20696e6e69742e
deep funk
BT Rep: +5
looking at content, speed and pretimes:
hdbits: is there a better hd site?
tl, sct, ftn: are there better 0-day sites?
bitmetv: is there a better tv site?
tt: is there a better site for trance?
that's why they all deserve the best [10].
waffles and what should be compared to oink[10], because it was the best.
but they are too young to be rated yet. (ok, maybe a [7-8])
Taste Good
BT Rep: +7
I agree with you, those are the sites that really set the bar on content, no matter how rare they arelooking at content, speed and pretimes:
hdbits: is there a better hd site?
tl, sct, ftn: are there better 0-day sites?
bitmetv: is there a better tv site?
tt: is there a better site for trance?
that's why they all deserve the best [10].
waffles and what should be compared to oink[10], because it was the best.
but they are too young to be rated yet. (ok, maybe a [7-8])
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks