View Poll Results: Foobar or Winamp?
- Voters
- 142. You may not vote on this poll
-
Living Dead
BT Rep: +2
foobar is faster, better and can even look more amazing than winamp (but i'm using default gui. its simple and cool )
.
-
-
02-01-2008, 05:44 PM
Software & Hardware -
#92
Member
I'm for Foobar2000 ... cause it uses less memory and works great with .Cue files
-
-
02-01-2008, 08:49 PM
Software & Hardware -
#93
n00b
-
-
02-01-2008, 09:46 PM
Software & Hardware -
#94
Custom User Title
BT Rep: +2
-
-
02-01-2008, 11:20 PM
Software & Hardware -
#95
Poster
-
-
02-03-2008, 11:35 PM
Software & Hardware -
#96
Member
I haven't tried Foobar yet, I have been meaning too for a while.
I do like WinAmp though, dosen't eat to much CPU memory either.
-
-
02-06-2008, 11:25 PM
Software & Hardware -
#97
MODERATION
BT Rep: +7
I always use Winamp , but in last days , i play music in WMP , too
-
-
02-07-2008, 01:51 PM
Software & Hardware -
#98
Member
Originally Posted by
ClodiuS
Winamp all time!
Exactly Winamp, is just the best!!!
-
-
02-07-2008, 07:31 PM
Software & Hardware -
#99
-
-
02-07-2008, 11:17 PM
Software & Hardware -
#100
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks