the lack of seeders is real bad. I almost dl 100 percent waffles now.
the lack of seeders is real bad. I almost dl 100 percent waffles now.
i d/l and can't seed bad...gg
i don't like lossless so already, most of the stuff on what.cd is useless to me. I think i've downloaded 2 albums total in my 2+ months being on that site, because it's impossible to get a good ratio. For the record, I wasn't with oink beforehand either.
I've never had a issue, downloaded plenty & just seed everything back - every seeds over time to well over 1 in ratio terms.
Sure you don't have a huge volume of people jumping on every single file, but give it a few days & you'll be fine.
Excellent for a still new tracker IMHO
Waffles is excellent for a new tracker. What is struggling, and it's clear to the staff that their policies are inferior to Waffles, which is why they've made their PU requirement almost identical to Waffles, culled their user base to match Waffle's seeder/leecher ratio, and cut back on invites.
I don't like comparing the two either, but the What staff themselves are making that comparison and doing their best to compensate for a significant disadvantage. Not as if this was a competition in the first place, of course.![]()
"Be easy, my ninja."
![]()
hmm i guess they need to have a bit of freeleeches if they dont have it
Shame neither site can sort out their 'scene' rip rules. At last 1/3 of supposed scene rips aren't scene at all or fail the sfv check.
Bookmarks