I duno if it is unisex. I'll have to defer to Mulder
What I'm thinking is even a lazy lob on might elicit a 'wow' reaction (or at least the raising of one eyebrow) if someone looked at his trousers - rather than no reaction if he didn't. Whereas the reaction to a woman's trousers would be the same if she was sexually aroused or not.
Unless she was wearing tight tan riding britches.
Who's looking fuzzy britches.![]()
Now go away.
Squeams is comfortably in the girl category - indeed well past Mulder's /would benchmark
Edit: on second thoughts on some days a diseased skunk seems to get past Mulder's /would benckmark.
In fact Squeamous may be actually be more grrrrllly than girly but she does have the good grace to be pretty with it.![]()
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum
Here's my avatar and age.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Last edited by Alien5; Jun 6th, 2006 at 06:36 PM..
Quality
Yeah, I don't usually read it these days owing to it being boring as feck since all the interesting posters forsook it - but I noticed Rat Faced posted so I read the thread to see if his outlook on life was as sleep inducing as ever.
It was a typical whine from him, as it happens, but I did follow it thro' to the end.
Bookmarks