I duno if it is unisex. I'll have to defer to Mulder
What I'm thinking is even a lazy lob on might elicit a 'wow' reaction (or at least the raising of one eyebrow) if someone looked at his trousers - rather than no reaction if he didn't. Whereas the reaction to a woman's trousers would be the same if she was sexually aroused or not.
Unless she was wearing tight tan riding britches.
Who's looking fuzzy britches.
Now go away.
Squeams is comfortably in the girl category - indeed well past Mulder's /would benchmark
Edit: on second thoughts on some days a diseased skunk seems to get past Mulder's /would benckmark.
In fact Squeamous may be actually be more grrrrllly than girly but she does have the good grace to be pretty with it.
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum
Here's my avatar and age.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Last edited by Alien5; Jun 6th, 2006 at 06:36 PM..
Quality
Yeah, I don't usually read it these days owing to it being boring as feck since all the interesting posters forsook it - but I noticed Rat Faced posted so I read the thread to see if his outlook on life was as sleep inducing as ever.
It was a typical whine from him, as it happens, but I did follow it thro' to the end.
Bookmarks