As I am not a member there, I have not gone through the rules. I just made a judgment base off the posts I've seen from (supposed) members. All said that the tracker wants to avoid unwanted attention, maybe its an unwritten rule, maybe the posters made it up, I don't know. But I do know if they want the attention lowered, the members just need to back off a bit and not create the kind of hype by continually posting about it.
Once again, if this isn't the case with them not wanting attention, I withdraw my statement.
Ok let's see..
I'm not against you, and much less against iTS. I respect you and all the members that you has there, i like your style "This is our tracker we deal with it like we want, we only accept people that we want".
But the point is that you are in all threads about iTS, saying that "You will not get it or you will get disabled at the same second that you get invited" This type of thinks are unnecessary, from my point of view. It's restryct! Full stop
Let the things happen, you will not get anything with that type of games.
"The mediocre teacher tells. The good teacher explains. The superior teacher demonstrates. The great teacher inspires."
**Don't PM me asking for invites**
Incorrect, the tactics that users have used have worked on decreasing the number of requests. There were maybe 10 requests last week for it...compared to like 30 at the beginning of January when users didn't actively slam threads with warnings.
The only reason that the request threads sprout up again is because the level went up to 5...so now everyone wants it just for its level.
If you think that by making it aware to the average user that trading will not get you into a tracker, is a bad way of getting your point across...then show me a better way that people will actually acknowledge and use.
Why do you think people request iTS or ScL or FSC or FTN...it is because they dont know about it and just hear lame rumors.
To be honest, in my opinion, the best 0day tracker, hands down, is SCC. Hell I only upload to iTS, ScL, FSC and FTN...I rarely download from any of those sites as I mainly use specialty trackers for what I want (hdbits for HD, swedvdr for dvd, bcg for games, tvt for complete series)
ScL is a 0day tracker, iTS is a scene only tracker as is FTN, FSC is a request based tracker that does also have 0day.
Nearly all trackers have the same content, people just want it for an epenis and to brag.
People just want trackers because they have, in their mind, this image that a high level tracker is the most amazing thing...yet when you get there, if you are only wanting to download stuff the fastest or have the fastest pretimes. The high level trackers....get smoked every day by lower level trackers...
Last edited by fatcat69; 02-04-2008 at 12:53 AM.
Funniest Post
Seedbox FAQ for Non Owners and Owners ***** Getting files off of your Seedbox Securely (FTP w/SSL) ***** Linux Seedbox Guide
I only sell invites on ebay, sorry guys, so dont bother pm'ing me.
Peace and Love and Unity to everybody.![]()
Now go away.
Yeah that's a fact, a normal fact nowadays. Let's see what will happen here:
https://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bit...llector-274790
This discussion is over for me, good luck with your tracker.
"The mediocre teacher tells. The good teacher explains. The superior teacher demonstrates. The great teacher inspires."
**Don't PM me asking for invites**
You are assuming that the increase in posts was only from the level increase. This probably started it, but I stand by the fact that without any replies, there would have been far less requests once they did start to come. If people see request threads constantly getting bumped to the top of the forum, they see it as a good sign lots of people will see their request, so they post one too. If the thread got 0 replies, people would be less likely to post one, since there is no interest.
I think i have to agree with a little of both yes people want to because it's up a level also people want it because it's new and don't have it. you make quite a valid point if people noticed it's ignored and never often replyed to then they will eventually go away and others will follow.
Last edited by sleepyy; 02-04-2008 at 01:04 AM.
Bookmarks