Rapidshare vs. BitTorrent

[Peanut]

i actually use both////
why/ (premium account)-(BT is the shit)
am on a music forum that people speed there life on uploading
(scene group rips ///// EAC rips) and all they use is RS
which is great
-cause not all BT sites have want you want (ONLY OINK RIP I TO SAY)

[becseGEI]

i actually use both

+1

[Swift]

i`m only on bittorrents don`t use rapidshare

[newswalker]

Is there some site like bitmetv, hdbits or what/waffles for rapidshare? If it is, rapidshare would be interesting to me. Otherwise rapidshare seems to me like usenet for people who don't have the time or brains to use usenet.

[Itoao]

I use both. I have to say I prefer the direct dk method when I can get it.

[Tulac]

I use torrents, public trackers for new popular stuff that is well seeded, and private for more obscure harder to find stuff. In any case speeds are good for me and RS is too much of a hassle, and I'm not ready to pay for the premium.

[sanjana]

Rapidshare really sucks... because of its limit and we need to pay for subscription... I hate that.. Bittorrent Rocks always... It does not matter I need to seed back the samee... Which I do always...

[Adydas23]

Bittorrent is the best way

[s0rinel]

I only use BitTorrent. I think it is the best way to get new stuff with a good speed and for free

[Ri0T]

Over Rapidshare, BT wins easily, but when Usenet enters the picture, the competition is way harder.