On a positive note,
It could solve the age old, male oedipus paranoia of;
is that my child.
Oui.
It could resolve some issues.
On a positive note,
It could solve the age old, male oedipus paranoia of;
is that my child.
Oui.
It could resolve some issues.
Last edited by 100%; 02-26-2008 at 11:25 PM.
i've never failed a screening, i don't smoke or take drugs.
If the government wants to hold records of my DNA, fingerprints, retinal scans and anything else which can identify me I have no problem with it. Why would I.
I think it's a genuinely small price to pay to make it easier to identify rapists, paedophiles, murderers and students.
"there is nothing misogynistic about anything, stop trippin.
i type this way because im black and from nyc chill son "
don't worry its not gonna happen anytime soon.
On that point, the argument exists that if everyone who fancied himself a decent person, submitted their DNA voluntarily, then it would narrow down investigations and so assist the proceedings without the need for a universal database.
Assuming, of course, that human beings are decent.
nobodys perfect. ...except the queen and a few others.
I participate in the odd activity that isn't seen as strictly legal and I may leave some DNA behind . So with this proposed new system, I would worry that every time I lit up a spliff (Or chucked a roach away) someone would arrest the fuck out of me. Or that they could if they felt like it.
I don't want to go in to any more detail.
Now go away.
Bookmarks