should be based on community-pre-speeds -privacy! thats it. fl.org does not have a huge variety so down but the rest -?
i think tracker levels should be:
rarity level + speeds/pre/content = number
for example:
UK-T 10 + 6 = 16
and hen make a list of 1-20 of all trackers
this way people really know which one is better
How are you guys doing today?
hmm but it wont, if they done it that way.
TL and RevTT will be 13
BitmeTV 15
that tracker 16
1 lvl 9 tracker 17
so it still wont tell you which one is better. but then it all depends on what you think is better.
Security go for a lvl 8+, lots of peers and fast speeds and content go for -3.
i dont think so
do u really think they both are in the same level
TranceTraffic[10]+7=17 U*-*[7]+10=17
i dunno...i dont have any of them...
but for example,everybody says DTN is way better than UK T,this way it'd be
FTN - 17
UK T - 16
How are you guys doing today?
how do you judge whether a community is good or not? have to lay out a whole set of parameters...that's just too much work, and opinions will always be biased..how do we know if the person is just saying good about one community because they like it better when others may think it's bad.
Bookmarks