if hdbits never open invOriginally Posted by kondrae
it should be at least lvl5(the staff like bimetv)
this open ,only have 1 inv for ppl (old inv removed,stays lvl4 is reasonable)
ps:hdbits maybe the one hard trackets to regist as i know(need answer 3 questions,if 2 wrong 88 the hdbits)
Poster
BT Rep: +30
Pretorians should be back to level 3. Sign up closed, and you can get an invite for 2 TB.
Ubuntu 8.04 user
BT Rep: +3
Why FTN have Tracker Ratings = 6. Few month ago (if i good remember) have 10. Now have less torrents?
Last edited by zdzichu007; 08-19-2008 at 05:47 PM.
Poster
BT Rep: +1
I wonder what's the reason to use this rating...There're almost no trades now especially trades involving high profile trackers.
Offers?
why did snowtigers move down?
BT Rep: +15
if it has a 6, that means quality, not rarity
i like skittles.
No surprises.
BT Rep: +4
I figure by logic SCT would move up to a high "rarity" level, since you can no longer simply donate for invites.
they didn't built Rome in one day
Poster
BT Rep: +3
Exactly!
It should be more than level 4, and I think nobody would deny it that ScT is one of the best and (maybe) hardest sites to be invited in.
Poster
BT Rep: +1
I'm not talking about the FTN (I know why it has such a low quality rating) I'm talking about the WIAW list itself. I think it outlived its usefulness and it's time to let the market decide the value of invites and accounts. Basically that's what's going on de-facto - the WIAW list gives you only the most basic idea what's your high level invite worth. Another thing is that accounts have much less liquidity than before - sometime ago you could easily retrade the unneeded account which is not the case now so basing your trading decisions on the list is not the safe.if it has a 6, that means quality, not rarity
Poster
BT Rep: +60
wats TTC, it shouldnt be on the list if it has no reviews
Posting Permissions
)
)
Bookmarks