Agree with you.Originally Posted by predateur
Level 5
ScT [10]
Level 3
SCC [10]
Is adding one point too much to asked for?
BT Rep: +1
Agree with you.
Level 5
ScT [10]
Level 3
SCC [10]
Is adding one point too much to asked for?
BT God
BT Rep: +100
can you guys honestly compare those 2 trackers as equal? ScT offers so much more imo. It has better retention. It backcatalogues pretty much every TV series in many different formats, has tons of unique packs, etc etc..Agree with you.
Level 5
ScT [10]
Level 3
SCC [10]
Is adding one point too much to asked for?
Maybe their pre-times do match up, but a rating of [9] is very good. I personally don't see those trackers on the same level. The exception is SCC free leech music section, which is easier for me than looking through SCT's music packs. I think [10] should be reserved for only the top sites in each specialization, but if enough of agree that SCC is equal to SCT then it can be changed to [10]. I only use the mp3 section of SCC so unless another mod or the WTAW agrees with you guys then I'll still be open to changes.
On a separate note: can any mac users rate the 2 new mac trackers in relation to brokenstones. preferably a regular here who has account on all 3.
Last edited by T.S.O.L.; 11-08-2008 at 07:07 AM.
I can understand TL is a [10], but why is RevTT a [10]?
how come revtt is 10 and scc is less than 10?
BT God
BT Rep: +100
please read Skizo's post before suggesting rating changes: https://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-wha.../postcount2271
anyone else think SCC should be rated a perfect 10, or another tracker that should get a higher or lower rating? again, refer to Skizo's examples in that link before asking for a change. The examples may be for changing levels, but you still must provide reasons instead of a simple "+1 ____ tracker should have a [_] rating"
Last edited by T.S.O.L.; 11-09-2008 at 08:16 AM.
home skillet
BT Rep: +4
Because...they are both basically the same content wise? You can't really give one a 10 without giving the other the same thing since they're so similar.I can understand TL is a [10], but why is RevTT a [10]?
On another note: I can understand why both TL & RevTT have [10] rankings, but IPT is only a [9]?. When IPT has a shit load more content than the other two.
But as T.S.O.L. mentioned, a [9] is still a good ranking. And I think the rating was bumped from a [7] to a [9] after the last time I said something. So can't really complain. But it's not like bumping from a [9] to a [10] would be a lie.
And no, I don't think SCC should be bumped to a [10]. Yes, the content that SCC has is great, but it doesn't have nearly as much of it as other 0day sites(SCT). So in my opinion a [9] is a correct rating for SCC.
EDIT: Oh wait, RevTT is not a [10]. Well, it should be bumped from a 9 back to a 10(don't see why it went down to a 9, considering all the great content it gets from their excellent Request section).
Last edited by Funkin'; 11-09-2008 at 02:06 PM.
my thoughts...
tl has better pres, longer retention due to peers, better speed especially older torrents, on a fresh browse page there seems to be so much new content upped.
revtt has a request section.
scc is fine at [9]
Last edited by TheGood; 11-09-2008 at 05:30 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
BT God
BT Rep: +100
Good points. I forgot about the request section when i moved it down one, I was only comparing the number of torrents with TL.Because...they are both basically the same content wise? You can't really give one a 10 without giving the other the same thing since they're so similar.
On another note: I can understand why both TL & RevTT have [10] rankings, but IPT is only a [9]?. When IPT has a shit load more content than the other two.
But as T.S.O.L. mentioned, a [9] is still a good ranking. And I think the rating was bumped from a [7] to a [9] after the last time I said something. So can't really complain. But it's not like bumping from a [9] to a [10] would be a lie.
And no, I don't think SCC should be bumped to a [10]. Yes, the content that SCC has is great, but it doesn't have nearly as much of it as other 0day sites(SCT). So in my opinion a [9] is a correct rating for SCC.
EDIT: Oh wait, RevTT is not a [10]. Well, it should be bumped from a 9 back to a 10(don't see why it went down to a 9, considering all the great content it gets from their excellent Request section).
home skillet
BT Rep: +4
Well, it's a little hard for me to tell exactly how much each of the three sites(IPT, TL, RevTT) actually have. Since none of them have a stats box. I know only the staff at IPT has access to the stats. Not sure about the other two.
But going by just the number of the browse page of each tracker:
TL: 16051-16054
RevTT: 18041-18060
IPT: 25041-25070
So going by the browse page of each trackers, TL actually has the least amount of content. Also to throw, IPT actually has a great request section too. It's not actually a system like RevTT's, it's just a forum. But every single thing I've requested so far there has been uploaded(RevTT too). So the uploaders at both sites are great.
So since all three sites basically contain the same scene content that is always uploaded, each have their own exclusive content that has been uploaded from requests. So in my opinion all three should have a [10] content rating(which actually I see RevTT was bumped back up).
BT Rep: +2
I am sorry but I wonder:
Why IPT is green, and why TL, scc, revtt are dark red?
Don't you think they all have similar content?
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks