What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]

[StefanSamara]

i think iPLAY go up
invites system is close

why ? so you can trade it ?

[Benja]

Ncore UP-no invite system right now and invite cost 500 points which is very hard to get.
RevTT UP-no invites right now and they kicked lots of memvers after sign up.
TL Stay-I cant tell why i just think it's more rare than other trackers in lvl 3.

[stoi]

This is just out of curiosity, how many members is too many members to up lvls in this, as that obviously has something to do with it. as i hear all the time, its got XXXXXXX members so cant go up.

is there an unwriten rule that.

LVL 4 and below is any,
LVL 5 is less than 30,000,
LVL 6 is less than 20,000,
LVL 7 is less than 15,000,
LVL 8 is less than 10,000,
LVL 9 and 10 is less than 5,000

above are just examples.

Just curiosity getting the better of me here more than anything else realy.

[Shultziboy]

PiSEXY got 10,000 and its not deserve to be in level 8 .
i think 6 for PiSEXY, no invites.

[WTAW]

This is just out of curiosity, how many members is too many members to up lvls in this, as that obviously has something to do with it. as i hear all the time, its got XXXXXXX members so cant go up.

is there an unwriten rule that.

LVL 4 and below is any,
LVL 5 is less than 30,000,
LVL 6 is less than 20,000,
LVL 7 is less than 15,000,
LVL 8 is less than 10,000,
LVL 9 and 10 is less than 5,000

above are just examples.

Just curiosity getting the better of me here more than anything else realy.

well, the number of members on a site is certainly a criterion to consider when determining its level cause it does affect rarity, less members, less potential traders in it, however it's not the only aspect to check

Others are :
Invite system specifications
How many time since invite system is closed
How many time since open-signup is closed
The difficulty to trade an account (with mail, ip history monitored closely by staff, etc...)
The demand vs the offer

So it's basically a case to case thing, judging by its size only would certainly be misleading

I still haven't seen a tracker with 30000+ members in the higher levels, but a specific context could make it possible i guess, who knows!

[stoi]

yeah i realise the other criteria, was just wondering if there an underlying rule somewhere, as like you say, there isnt any in the top lvls with over 30,000 members.

IMO and we are realising this with BCG atm, staying closed and having no invites makes the tracker stagnant, peers are dropping through the floor as everyone has everything they need. (mind you new games have been few lately so that could be another cause of this). and we have just went under 50,000 members.

this is why i believe that opening up or even invites are a good thing, a it brings new members to bring new life to the tracker, obviously there is always a downside as you get cheaters etc as well in with those new members.

ah well, just rambling here lol cheers for the answer though

[Benja]

The Vault in this system shoould be level 10...
so it's not good system.

[LivingInSouthPark]

This is just out of curiosity, how many members is too many members to up lvls in this, as that obviously has something to do with it. as i hear all the time, its got XXXXXXX members so cant go up.

is there an unwriten rule that.

LVL 4 and below is any,
LVL 5 is less than 30,000,
LVL 6 is less than 20,000,
LVL 7 is less than 15,000,
LVL 8 is less than 10,000,
LVL 9 and 10 is less than 5,000

above are just examples.

Just curiosity getting the better of me here more than anything else realy.

well, the number of members on a site is certainly a criterion to consider when determining its level cause it does affect rarity, less members, less potential traders in it, however it's not the only aspect to check

Others are :
Invite system specifications
How many time since invite system is closed
How many time since open-signup is closed
The difficulty to trade an account (with mail, ip history monitored closely by staff, etc...)
The demand vs the offer

So it's basically a case to case thing, judging by its size only would certainly be misleading

I still haven't seen a tracker with 30000+ members in the higher levels, but a specific context could make it possible i guess, who knows!

Soooo ScL and iTS both should go up to lv 6/7 very little amount of members and not many invites

[fatcat69]

Ok for torrentleech:

Members: 149,564 with open invites

How is that rarer then

HDBITS: Registered users21,000 Which is maxed at 21k users and not taking anymore.

Or how is TL = to ScL or iTS when both those trackers have under 5k members and invites are pretty hard to get.


am i taking crazy pillz?!

lol

[Shinigami]

According to me ScL and AOM should swap places. The reason for this:

- ScL is much more sought than AOM
- People only seek AOM for the level and most of the times only want to trade it further and not for personal use.
- ScL is already closed for signups, invite rules have changed (you have to have more than 100GB uploaded + 30 weeks registered)
- People offer more for an ScL invite than for AOM
- ScL offers content which more people are interested in than AOM does (AOM is only useful to a minority group)

For these reasons I think ScL and AOM should swap places. If not swapm then ScL should go up 1 level, next to AOM.