What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]

[eden297]

AOM no demand at all and level 6 ? why did it up lol level 5 is good for this tracker

AOM down (no demand)

PISEXY down (no demand (and this site not really good (in my opinion)))

TS-TRACKER UP (rare)

SCT up (more rare than other level 5)

czone down (was open for signup for long time - alot of people have accounts)

fsc down (more community than tracker and ftn has much more demand)

^^^^^^^^^^^
thats all

[LivingInSouthPark]

....... The lv is abouth the rarity man not about the demand

people are happy with the ranking OMG

Nope I want to hear ur opinion about MV i think it should go up

[fOrUmAs]

Maybe iTS and ScL should be lvl6 then fatcat. iTS and ScL are climbing the ladder of lvls very fast !

yeah and after a month they realoze that they are very rare but the sites are a piece of....

i dont no abouth iTS ,but flower is going to be p.o.s if they dont start some changes,sure they trying to get more people to be active but the true is that is not going very well..

they offer double upload and freeleech if they start to be active in torrenting but with no luck so far...

[fatcat69]

AOM no demand at all and level 6 ? why did it up lol level 5 is good for this tracker

AOM down (no demand)

PISEXY down (no demand (and this site not really good (in my opinion)))

TS-TRACKER UP (rare)

SCT up (more rare than other level 5)

czone down (was open for signup for long time - alot of people have accounts)

fsc down (more community than tracker and ftn has much more demand)

^^^^^^^^^^^
thats all

Read the OP please before posting:

ATTENTION PLEASE!!

This topic is classifying sites from level 1 to 10 based on their rarity

• 1 being the easiest to get into a site and 10 the hardest.
• This has nothing to do with contents of the trackers.
• Ratings of trackers themselves are in the [#] tags.

Demand has nothing to do with level!

If that logic was true, then u*-* would be level 4 and Waffles would be level 10

To your rankings:

Nearly all your reasons are not viable in this discussion, they are personal opinions and not fact. Levels are based on how hard it is to get into the site.

FTN in no way is harder to get into then FSC. FTN still has invites out, and lots of them. FTN also has alot more members, therefore less rare.

ScT gave out invites to all power users at xmas. You state that it is more rare then iTS/ScL and other level 5's. iTS has only 10 users outside staff that have invites. 10 ScL only allows 50 of its users to ask for invites...ASK, it does not mean they will get one.

If you can show proof that there are less then 100 users with invites at ScT, id be happy to agree with you, however that is not the case. ScT has been offered for both of the above mentioned sites and turned down. ScT invite giveaways are far more common ever since the xmas invite granting to all power users.

You need to realize that content is in the [ ] while rarity is level.

[sunrise01]

Zamunda 0-day tracker .. i think 0-day trackers with rare files and packs.

[danio]

....... The lv is abouth the rarity man not about the demand

Nope I want to hear ur opinion about MV i think it should go up

You don't think demand has an effect on the rarity? If two trackers have 15k users each and the total number of invites the users has is 10k (equal on both sites) and there are 100k users wanting to join tracker 1, while 10k users are looking for an invitation to tracker 2. In other words, 10 times as many people is trying to obtain an invite to tracker 1 than there is people trying to get into tracker 2 while the number of invites available on each site is equal. Would you say the rarity of these two trackers is the same?

Now i don't really care for rarity anyways, more than the security factor. But really, as long as the trackers aren't open for sign-ups i feel safe enough, so whether they are lvl 10 or 3 doesn't really matter. What's important is what the tracker has to offer.. But i just felt i had to point equation flaws out to you since you are wrong

[eden297]

AOM down (no demand)

PISEXY down (no demand (and this site not really good (in my opinion)))

TS-TRACKER UP (rare)

SCT up (more rare than other level 5)

czone down (was open for signup for long time - alot of people have accounts)

fsc down (more community than tracker and ftn has much more demand)

^^^^^^^^^^^
thats all

Read the OP please before posting:

ATTENTION PLEASE!!


This topic is classifying sites from level 1 to 10 based on their rarity

• 1 being the easiest to get into a site and 10 the hardest.
• This has nothing to do with contents of the trackers.
• Ratings of trackers themselves are in the [#] tags.

Demand has nothing to do with level!

If that logic was true, then u*-* would be level 4 and Waffles would be level 10

To your rankings:

Nearly all your reasons are not viable in this discussion, they are personal opinions and not fact. Levels are based on how hard it is to get into the site.

FTN in no way is harder to get into then FSC. FTN still has invites out, and lots of them. FTN also has alot more members, therefore less rare.

ScT gave out invites to all power users at xmas. You state that it is more rare then iTS/ScL and other level 5's. iTS has only 10 users outside staff that have invites. 10 ScL only allows 50 of its users to ask for invites...ASK, it does not mean they will get one.

If you can show proof that there are less then 100 users with invites at ScT, id be happy to agree with you, however that is not the case. ScT has been offered for both of the above mentioned sites and turned down. ScT invite giveaways are far more common ever since the xmas invite granting to all power users.

You need to realize that content is in the [ ] while rarity is level.

ok so AOM should be level 8 or 9

[LivingInSouthPark]

Zamunda 0-day tracker .. i think 0-day trackers with rare files and packs.

No it is not with rare files and there are not alot of packs there
but anyway it is still one of the best trackers for me
There are some stuff that u cant find in any other tracker ... amazing content and it has 50786 torrents it should be 9 not 8

Torrent upload at 2005-03-31
12:57:54 still have some seeders and alot of other torrents which are upload long time ago have seeders

[fatcat69]

ok so AOM should be level 8 or 9

Where do you get that? I stated about 10 posts ago that AOM is level 6, due to how hard it is to get an invite. What are you smoking kid?


Just because it is not in high demand here at FST doesnt mean its not rare.

I havent seen a demand for F*** or u*-* in a while, so those arent rare anymore? seriously, look at your argument, atleast I have facts to back mine up.

If demand =rarity, then water is the rarest substance on earth...since everyone demands it.


Believe it or not, FST is not the entire torrent invite world

[eden297]

ok so AOM should be level 8 or 9

Where do you get that? I stated about 10 posts ago that AOM is level 6, due to how hard it is to get an invite. What are you smoking kid?


Just because it is not in high demand here at FST doesnt mean its not rare.

I havent seen a demand for F*** or u*-* in a while, so those arent rare anymore? seriously, look at your argument, atleast I have facts to back mine up.

If demand =rarity, then water is the rarest substance on earth...since everyone demands it.


Believe it or not, FST is not the entire torrent invite world

SO IF I CREAT NEW TRACKER WITH 80 TORRENTS AND 50 MEMBERS THAT NO ONE HAS INVITES, AND I WILL MAKE A REVIEW OF IT IN FST, WILL IT BE LEVEL 10?