This thread has a lot of bashing rarred or unrarred, so I'd just like to stress that there's nothing dangerously or horribly wrong with rarred or unrarred release on trackers: obviously, both work. I just wanted to say that as BT trackers aren't the scene, we aren't bound to the scene rule of rarred files. Some trackers have acknowledged that and allowed scene releases to be uploaded rarred, and some trackers prefer the untouched scene upload. Again, both work, and there's obviously pros and cons for both.
they didn't built Rome in one day
I posted before saying I really didn't care, but after having to unrar 2 complete tv series, I'm changing my vote to unrarred.
Each episode was its own archive, so it took forever...
Never minded unrarring movies and such, but whole series, thats ridiculous and tedious.
I used to only unrar what I wanted to watch, but now I have my ps3, and I want my media ready to be streamed so I can view it whenever I want.
Good thing I get most of my tv from Bitmetv...
Scene standards are just that: standards that are good for 'the scene', not standards of p2p.
RAR'd please. Scene packing makes me hard.
of course rarred!!
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/
I prefer unrar'd because I don't use programs to watch RAR'D videos and plus after I unrar a file I basically get double what I originally got and I'm limited on harddrive space. :>
I also prefer unrared coz of the same reason as above.. also takes too much time unraring big files..
Bookmarks