lol @ i want to listen to that shit not create it
lol @ i want to listen to that shit not create it
I am a exsellent speller and I use grammer very good.
I am curious what is the difference between flac and mp3. its all same for your ipods.Beside 128 kbps mp3 file a little space in your mp3 players and/or hard drives
another classic motto : i want to listen to that shit not create it
I dont need pictures like '74 Gremlin to a '08 Ferrari. can you give some specific details I need numbers reasonable phrases. and please consider that desktop speakers and or portable players. Is it really necessary or ?
for a low end desktop setup and most portable devices, flac is pointless. The only reason in either of those situations that you would want/need flac, is for the future.
Flac quality can only be appriciated with those that have the equiptment capable of playing it.
Think of it this way: Would you really need a blu-ray player if you only had an SDTV (not HD compatable)? It would be nice to have for the future, but you are really not getting anything out of having it now.
Good start but bad finish why you need to start immediatly examples. Just try to prouve Flac is better than MP3 with numbers maybe or other parametres.
BTW I am using Cowon D2 portable and have b&w 802 Nautilus connected to Meridian 501
From some website:
"With FLAC bitrates are around 700 to 1100kbps with rock/pop and 400 to 700kbps with classical."
That alone shows the numbers you seek I think, most mp3 is what, < 400kbps?
I could be wrong on this one, just trying to give you your numbers in an easy way. There are websites with PAGES of information on FLAC vs MP3 vs WMA vs ...
Bookmarks