I am using bitcomet for a while, but it always cause my lan network slow down a lot. Is utorent better than bitcomet?
I wonder they work the same way and doen't help.
Or how can I configure the client to limit the bandwidth?
I am using bitcomet for a while, but it always cause my lan network slow down a lot. Is utorent better than bitcomet?
I wonder they work the same way and doen't help.
Or how can I configure the client to limit the bandwidth?
Yes, IMO Utorrent is better than bitcomet.
First tho do a speed test on your connection and set the preference for bandwidth @ 80% of your max speed.
In Utorrent to adjust settings for bandwidth usage go to options ---> preferences ---> connection and input the value you want to use.
Please do not randomly PM asking for invites as I have none to give out. Have a nice day.
I've read that bitcomet ignored some bittorrent protocol rules, and that assisted some users in seeding where they normally would not. For this its banned on many private trackers.
See more:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitCome..._and_Criticism
I'm using utorrent; although, it has its own little controversy because it was acquired by media conglomerates whom wish it was 1984 - both proverbially and literally.
BitComet is a guarantee for being kicked in most private trackers.
well i dont know if its better but utorrent is the most popular tracker atm..
so that is telling something i guess...its very light on memory and cpu unlike other...
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/
bitcomet is nicer imo
i like skittles.
utorrent.i guess
bitcomet is the worst bit torrent client as it does not fully seed to the connections potential .. It also harms the Swarm speed by frequently discon itself to rejoin so that it gets higher download priority
I'm surpised it's still functional . I take it that you weren't using it on private trackers huh?
Bookmarks