Originally Posted by
Oles
Good morning,
Following our message of Friday on P2P on our network,
we can say it was read. Certainly understood half, deformed
by discussing parties who are passionate in every sense,
who often have nothing to do with the subject.
Now we are listening here are the details concerning the management
the abuse of P2P.
Our network has no vocation to become the dustbin of Internet
where one can freely exchange any sort of illegal file. It is
the main message we wish to convey. According to our estimates,
Only 300/400 dedicated servers on 40000 make the exchange of file
in different forms. It is little, but the trend is to take a
dedicated server, cheap (which said cheap, low risk) to exchange
faster because the file servers use or 100Mbps
1Gbps bandwidth! You want to break this trend and reduce
as much as possible the number of servers that make this activity. Hence
Friday's message, which has obviously been read and heard.
The technical details:
The problem arises in the 2-3% of cases where the client puts in place
tools with PUBLIC access to exchange files, or because
it was his "job", either because it is a great beginning. In
2 cases, Ovh will always intervene to stop this kind of use
our infrastructure.
The alerts we receive through our robots audits. With
the public links it takes 5 seconds to determine what the customer
proposes exactly.
[...]
It should still define a 20čne points that were raised.
20 These details will again create a buzz and it will again
repreciser. We will do more simple.
The alerts, we receive will be automatically returned to
clients. After 3 alerts, the server will be suspended with
the possibility of recovering data, but the need to resettle
the system. Again, after 3 alerts, Ovh will intervene, but
is to suspend the server and break the contract. The customer may
still retrieve the data.
Thank you for your feedback
Yours
Octave
Bookmarks