Regarding My "adult" Materials...

[J'Pol]

Because if you don't discuss it then it leaves the collective consciousness.

Which plays into the hands of the perverts.

People always talk about what they would do if they met someone like this. The simple truth is that, for most people they would turn the other way. They chose not to have to cope with it.

Fortunately there are others who are willing to try to do something about it.
Unfortunately they are more ofter vilified than applauded.
Fortunately they don't do it for the praise, rather because it needs done. On behalf of the voiceless.

[Nimdock]

Well, that's what I said in summary... hehe...

I meant, stop the discussion and let's do something about it! (At least those who can, or let's take a decision collectively, I don't know if as users we have a counting voice on this forum, but I think actions should be taken, after all, that ss room is just an extension of this forum and as a whole form part of the same community).

[J'Pol]

Originally posted by Nimdock@23 August 2003 - 09:31
Well, that's what I said in summary... hehe...

I meant, stop the discussion and let's do something about it! (At least those who can, or let's take a decision collectively, I don't know if as users we have a counting voice on this forum, but I think actions should be taken, after all, that ss room is just an extension of this forum and as a whole form part of the same community).

I agree.

[lynx]

On the first page of this thread, I posted what could be interpreted as support for Chalkmongoose. I did this assuming that what he had posted about the material he had 'shared' was true, as I could only foresee falsehood as being exposed. From the comments of others who say they saw what was on offer, I can now only assume that such falsehood has indeed been exposed.

I wish to make it perfectly clear that I completely withdraw any implied support for his actions, the only conclusion I can now come to is that he is a lying pedophile scumbag. Since I have no way of silencing him, I shall take the option of completely ignoring any post he makes, if he starts a post I shall not read them, if he posts in an existing thread I shall ignore it. Perhaps if we all do the same he will get the message and leave.

[titey]

I've been doing that for weeks.... doesn't seem to slow him down any.

[RGX]

Well, seems to me i didnt look at the whole story then, and my apologies for it, I assumed the videos would be based around 16 yr olds etc (which is legal here in the uk) and maybe that would be forgivable, however with the new evidence bought to light, and mentions of girls as young as 4 at some point, it seems to me that I have made a mistake.

Sorry for trusting before viewing all views, and to anyone I may have offended by sympathising with him.

[Skweeky]

May I ask, did someone report this already?

[Billy_Dean]

Originally posted by JPaul@22 August 2003 - 02:48
I don't care how old anyone is.

To have material which is of a sexual nature and depicts minors is wrong. Whether you are 14, 16, 18 or anything else.

To then share it with others and promote pedophilia is worse, again I really don't care what age the person supplying it is.

I realise that this is contrary to what most of the rest of you think. However I find the logic that you can have pictures of people 3 years younger or older than you being acceptable totally abhorrent.

Please do not try to convince me that a 16 year old having explicit pictures of a 13 year old is OK. It isn't.

Anyone wanting this material, whatever their age creates a market for it. Which makes it happen more, which subjects more children to this. How can it be ok just because the market is also young people. For fuck sake think it thro'.

I got to page 5 before I found this quote. I completely agree with you Jpaul.

[Assultsniper]

Well remeber when you guys were his age girls are girls when youre a teenager but 5 years is too far apart!

[Night Ass]

Hey I am 17

if he is 16 i think it is all right for him to be looking a porn of gals one yr unger but no more then 1 yr.

it seem to me we have a simerler problum about porn but in my cace i dont find gals under 22 to be attractive.

now if he looks at below one yr unger them him self eg 14,13 then he has a porblum and shood seek help but ignoring all his posts and trying to get him to leve is not nice. (just like how gays use to be treated)

and as far as i know all of his past posts have been fine.
So long as he is not trying to post kiddy porn pics on this forum i dont see whats the problum.

now who fond thees pics that he was sharing who was searching for RAPE,14yr gals and so forth.

now in aus the age of consent is 16
now dus that meen if a guy and a gal was going out & having S^X her being 15 and 11 months and him being 15 and 1 month wen she terned 16 wood thay have to stop having S^X for 10 mouths?

Now u know drugos how thay need drugs
i am shor peterfiles r like that so u shoodent treat them bad just the dealers of the kiddy porn

now imajon you thort 23 yr old gals where hot and then one day u where told 23 yrs gals was to yong and then all thes ppl called u a peterfile and wonted to kick you out of the forum and ppl sed u ofended them just being in the same forum and u cant help what u fine attractive
just like gays will be gays and peterfiles will be peterfiles
i am not say Gays r like peterfile by the way