![Quote](https://i.filesharingtalk.com/misc_fst/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Polarbear
let's hope none of you (tracker staff) will ever have to debate this question with a highly paid prosecutor. i think he might beg to differ.
i didn't refer to bcg by the way. i don't even know wether you have a pay2leech system or not.
OiNK was accused of something like, "making money in the name of 'donations'". They even said OiNK membership could only be obtained by payment. And when torrentfreak wrote otherwise, the authorities responded something like "180,000 OiNK members must have been more generous then I expected ." wacko
The point is if authorities were to break into a tracker, they would not give a flying f about whether a tracker has P2l or not....they can make up their own stuff and people (plus media) will easily buy it. Yes, P2L might be additional cause for severe the punishment but how worse can it make?
editZ: oink bail extended to 10th lozl.
Bookmarks