
Originally Posted by
JPaul
Good point. The very least they are guilty of is not monitoring the material to be broadcast thoroughly enough.
It went up to a senior member of staff for it to be approved. The BBC knew exactly what was being broadcast.
These two are getting paid so much just because they dare to be controversial, that's not a secret. As I see it, they were doing what their employers expected them to do do, and quite obviously agreed with.
Sachs today on the radio said that he doesn't want to take the matter any further and had received apologies from both of them. If that's enough for him, than why shouldn't it be for the rest of the public?
Bookmarks