Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 52

Thread: Clarkson furore

  1. #41
    Agrajag's Avatar Just Lame
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,524
    Quote Originally Posted by rodi View Post
    ?????????
    I agree with the slow kid.

  2. Lounge   -   #42
    Agrajag's Avatar Just Lame
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,524
    [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pDTiFkXgEE&feature=related[/youtube]

  3. Lounge   -   #43
    Skweeky's Avatar Manker's web totty
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    11,052


    Still makes me laugh!

  4. Lounge   -   #44
    Agrajag's Avatar Just Lame
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,524
    It's fucking ace.

  5. Lounge   -   #45
    Skweeky's Avatar Manker's web totty
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    11,052
    It's on tonight btw; BBC 4, 9PM.

  6. Lounge   -   #46
    Agrajag's Avatar Just Lame
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,524
    Football > *.*

  7. Lounge   -   #47
    Skweeky's Avatar Manker's web totty
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    11,052
    It'll be on iPlayer.

  8. Lounge   -   #48
    Biggles's Avatar Looking for loopholes
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Age
    67
    Posts
    8,169
    Are there people out there employed to be offended these days?
    Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum


  9. Lounge   -   #49
    Agrajag's Avatar Just Lame
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,524
    Quote Originally Posted by Biggles View Post
    Are there people out there employed to be offended these days?
    The Telegraph was interesting when they juxtaposed Clarkson and Ross / Brand.

  10. Lounge   -   #50
    Agrajag's Avatar Just Lame
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,524
    Well, here’s a complaint of my own: we’re complaining far too much now. I won’t defend Clarkson’s line as a joke: it’s not very funny. But I don’t agree that it’s offensive in the way that Brand and Ross were. Brand and Ross humiliated a blameless man on national radio. They picked on somebody.

    Clarkson did not. He made a flippant remark about a kind of person – nobody specific, just a stereotype, a caricature. It wasn’t subtle, it wasn’t clever, it wasn’t tasteful. But it wasn’t intended to hurt.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m.../04/do0405.xml

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •