Dbl post.
Last edited by j2k4; 11-08-2008 at 01:15 PM.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
That last assumes Obama was unbeatable, period, which is just plain wrong.
McCain did do better than he should have done on the face of things, which indicates Obama'a vulnerability on many points - I would posit that had McCain played a better game, and let Obama have it right between the eyes occasionally, he may even have won.
Suffice it to say that the fact Obama got a mere "solid victory" as opposed to a "landslide" over a candidate like McCain tells the truer story.
Bush beat Kerry by a few percentage points in '04, and you libs started with your "but that isn't a mandate" crap; must you be bitter in victory as well.
Fact is, if Obama was everything you think, he should've beaten McCain like Johnson beat Goldwater in '64.
EDIT-
It was Bush-hate and Obama'a tying McCain to Bush in every way he could (and there was not an appearance by Obama or his surrogates anywhere, anytime, when they failed make the connection) that won him the election.
Period.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
He didn't win well enough so that's like a fail
FFS Kev, can you hear yourself.
I don't think he can. That's why he posts innit.
How hard do you think it was to tie McCain to Bush?
His record was pretty clear and who else was more of a "maverick"?
And why is it that Republicans refuse to take any responsibility for the "Bush-hate"?
You aided and abetted Bush for eight years and suddenly seem surprised to learn that his- and by extension, your- approach was reviled and hated.
Really, what did you expect?
"I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg
Yes, I can.
It's called post-vote analysis.
You aren't familiar, I gather?
Would you regard yourself as uninformed as to the history of your football; never inclined to speak of events recently past.
Will you have anything to say about Calzaghe/Jones on Sunday should (God forbid) Joe lose?
Do you require that I generate an extended post congratulating Obama?
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
The fact you brought up the electoral college indicates your misapprehension.
I said Bush/Kerry, not Bush/Gore, so who is hung up on the electoral college.
If you had been paying attention, you'd have noticed my support for Bush was of a qualified flavor, whereas your aversion to him was blanketly total - in short, your knee-jerk hatred didn't allow you to see any positives whatsoever.
I find tremendous irony in saying to you that while I spent considerable time criticizing him, you could never find favor with anything he did; your modus operandi would have been to find an "oil" motive behind his aid-to-Africa program.
In any case, we have a new program to watch, and I, unlike you, will not begin it by defaulting to fawning worship of the new "messiah".
He will do what he will do, and I will laud or criticize as I see fit.
I look forward to your first criticism of Obama, should it ever occur...though I am not holding my breath.![]()
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
But there is nothing positive about Bush, nothing at all, from stealing two elections, to bankrupt the country, to do away with our personal freedoms, there is nothing positive about his presidence.
The guy is dumber than a plastic doll, he doesn't know right from wrong.
Obama is not amessiah, he is a regular inteligent man, that America hopes he will fix Bush's mess.
Bookmarks