well extensions can't exactly be built by google and still compete against ff...until the developers chip in, it's still got a long way to go (its a good start however)
One n Only
BT Rep: +2
well extensions can't exactly be built by google and still compete against ff...until the developers chip in, it's still got a long way to go (its a good start however)
(_8(I)
What?Originally Posted by kooltilldend
yo
One n Only
BT Rep: +2
bloody hell...i really should go to bed now lolWhat?
basically I mean, that as long as the extensions are made by external developers (like for FF) and not just developed internally by Google then chrome may have a chance of taking over FF
Excelsior
BT Rep: +5
google chrome is the next best thing,they recently removed 4 new crash scenerios and are working on improvements,only if they add some quality plugins to it..it would take over FF.Just my two cents
I have been using chrome for a few weeks now as opposed to FF, it feels a bit faster to me, but some websites don't display right in it. The speed is good though, very slick browser.
Mike
.
I have always heard people say that Chrome loads pages much faster than other browsers, partly because of its extremely optimized V8 JavaScript VM - but for me, JS-intensive sites such as Facebook actually load slower and make the browser use 100% CPU.
Not to mention all its call-homes and tracking IDs, which is why we banned it at SB-I. I'd recommend using Iron or ChromePlus, where they're removed.
Excelsior
BT Rep: +5
the load time is comparable,but the cold start time is much much faster
yeah think so.
Google need to make it user friendly with tools. its just complicated.
Poster
BT Rep: +1
Firefox have too get veeeeery slow before I give up my extensions.
Last edited by Speedo; 12-24-2009 at 06:37 PM.
Posting Permissions
.Just my two cents
Bookmarks