Black Rabbit? More like bacon rabbit!

[Popov]

I have also all I need (but not all I want ). But I actually think it's more fun to see the tracker grow like bR, instead of like FSC just be the same every day. It's a bit like Windows and Linux. Windows already have the majority of the costumers and don't have to care about the costumers very much. But Linux don't have very much users, so they have to have better support, service and better stuffs than Windows to survive. FSC are already big, and they have already alot of persons who could kill to be a part of the site. But bR have to take care of their members in a different way otherwise they'll go to other trackers. (I didn't said that FSC staff are bad, because they are awesome !)

I hope you got my point !

what's with the userbars of the trackers you know want their privacy

I'm prod of my trackers, That's why I have them there. I don't post the url, and you can find the bars here on FST. So that's not a problem actually !

[Albo Da Kid]

But bR have to take care of their members in a different way otherwise they'll go to other trackers.

I agree to that. The thing with br though, is that they like to talk more than act. The only thing i have seen that i liked in their community, is the effort they put into their forums. They try to get the activity going in there and they're maintaining a good pace at it. But I have seen no effort in the other parts of the community. Staff is a little rude and the content is not where it's supposed to be. Silverseed was a site to take example from. It was up for only about a month and it already had about 1700 torrents, which was all rare stuff. The sysop himself uploaded 90% of the content. Only if the br staff put the same efforts, we wouldn't be discussing about their tracker in this manner right now. I think they have been up about a month and they only have about 160 torrents. Cmon guys wake up if you want to make your tracker succeed

[respawn40]

yes, we talk all day abt good sites (iTS, FSC, FTWR, SCT) and bad sites (bR, czone, scl, iFi).

I fixed your post.

[Popov]

But bR have to take care of their members in a different way otherwise they'll go to other trackers.

I agree to that. The thing with br though, is that they like to talk more than act. The only thing i have seen that i liked in their community, is the effort they put into their forums. They try to get the activity going in there and they're maintaining a good pace at it. But I have seen no effort in the other parts of the community. Staff is a little rude and the content is not where it's supposed to be. Silverseed was a site to take example from. It was up for only about a month and it already had about 1700 torrents, which was all rare stuff. The sysop himself uploaded 90% of the content. Only if the br staff put the same efforts, we would be discussing about their tracker in this manner. I think they have been up about a month and they only have about 160 torrents. Cmon guys wake up if you want to make your tracker succeed

Never heard of silverseed, so it can't be that good . I mean, Everyone have heard of bR now, right ?! ...

but I get your point, maybe staff should take more responsibility . But if one person does everything it will be like GFT but without very fast PRE-times. It's more personal and easier to love if everyone helps each other . But there's uploadingcompetitions there now, so the uploads will probably increases a lot now !

[Albo Da Kid]

Silverseed is a musicvid tracker. It just poped up in the radar and the reason why it isn't that known is because they've been down for a while. Their content is great and amazing speeds for a new site. It looks promising imo.

Regarding br..Uploading competitions always help. But they don't last forever. Lets just hope they become more dedicated. It's up to them if they want to make it or not.

[pone44]

How he could ever be a member of any of those is beyond me?

yes, we talk all day abt good sites (iTS, FSC, FTWR, SCT) and bad sites (bR, czone, scl, iFi).

I fixed your post.

[dogie]

yes, we talk all day abt good sites (iTS, FSC, FTWR, SCT,bR, czone, scl, iFi,) and bad sites ().

I fixed your post.

fixed again theres no bad sites, its just about what site do you like more

[LRm]

bR brown()Rabbit

[alcoholik]

[vic]

@popov

but you know that they don't even like this kind of publicity.