I clearly noted that in the little section saying 'P.S.' However, as I've said, nowadays the LAME encoder is pretty good at avoiding creating artifacts in the sound...
You can't 'feel' the difference, so quit it what that mumbo jumbo - when people say they can 'feel' some music they're talking about the emotions and soul, and not a FLAC recording, lol.You can copy and paste as many spectrum analysis charts as you like but they won't convince me I can't tell the difference when I clearly can 128 to V2 & V2 to V0 is quite easy for me to differentiate between V0 to CD is harder but the difference is there remember not everything you get from listening to music is in audible range. Ever heard the phrase feeling the music ?
Anyway, evidently you don't want to listen to my cold hard science. I'm just saying that statistically and biologically speaking what you've said is improbable. If you want to argue some new-age shit about 'feeling the FLAC' then go ahead. I'll merely stand here laughing at you until you get a grip.
It proves that people that say they can hear the difference between FLAC and V0 are likely to be speaking out of their asses. Although don't feel that I'm having a go at you, the whole of What.CD and Waffles.FM want to believe that they can 'hear the difference'. Generally it's just a placebo unless you're superhuman.K I can also hear upto 19Khz through that test with shitty 50 quid Sony headphones plugged into my soundblaster X-Fi and I'm more than 10 years older than you so that doesn't really prove anything either way does it.
I mean, perhaps some people can properly tell the difference...
Note: Of course FLAC is obviously preferred to archive though. =]
Bookmarks