Im running a 233 laptop, 4gb hard disk and 64 ram which operating system would be better 98 or 2000?
Im running a 233 laptop, 4gb hard disk and 64 ram which operating system would be better 98 or 2000?
i would say 98 cuz window 2000 will probably leave ur laptop begging for mercy
Have you checked if you even can get drivers for 2000. Im just asking because my brother had a similar old laptop and the only OS they supported was 98
You Better Keep In Mind That I Can Read Between The Lines
Never argue with an idiot, they drag you down to there level and beat you with experience!!
That configuration is the absolute minimum required for Win2k, performance would be terrible, go for windows 98.
.Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
There's performance configuration on Win2k?
Because for me it's really slow espcally when i'm trying to start my computer
Ohh noo!!! I make dribbles!!!
No, I meant 233MHz with 64kram is minimum config.
.Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
98
xp? doesnt that take up even more than 2k?.. or cus its pro, does it take up less?Originally posted by Makaveli-tha-don@14 September 2003 - 17:13
i would say Windows XP Professional~
signature removed, check the boardrules.
I believe it was just another MS windows XP cheerleader trying to make funny.
Bookmarks