Looking at this from FST's point of view, if the trading section has been there for all these years there must be a good reason for it. It leads me to believe that FST majorly benefits from it. And if it does then I don't see why they should remove it, because the staff would do what's best for their site,just as torrent site owners do what's best for theirs.
It's important to recognise the fact that the torrent forums are only a part of FST which is a massive site in totality,quite possible the torrent sections generate a lot of traffic but it doesn't fully constitute this place.
I don't see why FST is obligated to follow tracker site rules and they really don't have to , I suspect it's out of sheer goodwill that they cooperate with certain tracker staff.
What I find puzzling is that a year or two ago trading wasn't considered bad at all,infact it was done very openly and even hailed as good.
Fast forward to right now ,its a cardinal sin to trade. There is such a paradigm shift with this whole anti-trading phenomenon being the new cool.
Let's consider this for instance:- FST somehow feels pressured by tracker admins or for the greater good of private trackers remove the trading section. Staff are merry,anti-traders are merry.
Next,the trackers staff somehow influence FST(or FST grows a conscience) to remove "public giveaways"(Remember public giveaways is frowned upon too and is against most private trackers rules) and so its removed.
Finally, tracker staff think that filling their site's invite requests at a public forum as big as this is somehow harmful to their site and that torrent tracker invites should only be "distributed" at torrent sites. So they pressure FST to ban that too. Now you have the entire invite section completely wiped out. I wonder how much FST would lose out of this,MASSIVE probably? A negative cascading effect of epic proportions?
And I haven't even started with the beaten-to-death argument of whether trading is bad or not..
Bookmarks