Your Ad Here Your Ad Here
Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Hey, Warner, Leave those Kids Alone

  1. #1
    Lady LoTL's Avatar Neamhbhásmhar BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Dallas for TSO...
    Hey, Warner, Leave those Kids Alone

    Commentary by Corynne McSherry

    "Last month we reported that Warner Music Group was using YouTube’s Content I.D. (aka Video I.D.) tool to effectively censor myriad fair uses. We asked people to contact us if they needed legal help and put up a YouTube removal primer to give folks information about their options. As a result we’ve seen beautiful film montages set to music, videos to assist the hearing impaired, and many other examples of amazing artistic talent that have been censored by Warner Music.

    But it turns out the problem is even worse than we thought. One way to check Warner’s abuse is for fair users to challenge improper Content I.D. takedowns. But very few are willing to do so, because they are afraid of the consequences.

    Why are people scared? Because our broken copyright system leaves them facing the prospect of paying outrageous statutory damages and even possibly Warner's attorneys' fees if they stand up, fight back and, despite overwhelming odds in their favor, lose. It’s a gamble with their life savings that most people just aren’t willing to take, even when their works are clear fair uses and even if EFF gives them free legal help.

    Of course, it’s hardly in the interest of a copyright owner to sue a creator who has engaged in an obvious fair use. In fact, we’re not aware of any content owner ever suing an individual YouTube user over a remix video. And since Warner is taking the videos down sight unseen, there’s no indication Warner actually objects to any particular video. So these creative, beautiful works are simply collateral damage in Warner’s negotiation with YouTube over revenue sharing. Thus, the Content I.D. tool, in the hands of a careless copyright owner, has helped create the worst of all worlds: incredibly easy takedowns on one side, and an intimidating put-back procedure that seems to invite legal risk on the other..."

    Homepage: Electronic Frontier Foundation
    Last edited by Detale; 02-28-2009 at 03:44 AM.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts